The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11‐year‐old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity
Abstract
The concern about students' engagement with school science and the numbers pursuing the further study of science is an international phenomenon and a matter of considerable concern among policy makers. Research has demonstrated that the majority of young children have positive attitudes to science at age 10 but that this interest then declines sharply and by age 14, their attitude and interest in the study of science has been largely formed. This paper reports on data collected as part of a funded 5‐year longitudinal study that seeks to determine how students' interest in science and scientific careers evolves. As an initial part of the study, six focus group discussions were undertaken with schoolchildren, age 10–11, to explore their attitudes toward science and interest in science, the findings of which are presented here. The children's responses are analyzed through the lens of identity, drawing on a theoretical framework that views identity as an embodied and a performed construction that is both produced by individuals and shaped by their specific structural locations. This work offers new insights into the manner in which students construct representations of science and scientists. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 94:617–639, 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants
Kitzinger, J. (1994) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023 · Cited by 3,870
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433
Understanding Minority Ethnic Achievement
Archer, L., & Francis, B. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203968390 · Cited by 116
Self-citation
Cited by
Science Achievement Gaps Begin Very Early, Persist, and Are Largely Explained by Modifiable Factors
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x16633182 · Cited by 508
Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00060 · Cited by 502
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F., Lee, M., Sanusi, I. T., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. S. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104582 · Cited by 469
Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science
Dou, R., Hazari, Z., Dabney, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2019) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21499 · Cited by 326
Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O'Neill, T. (2013) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21123 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-21
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 617-639
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2153453328
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 43.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11‐year‐old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.20399
- The paper
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11‐year‐old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.