The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Cited by
Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate
Yamamoto, Y. T. (2012) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662510371435 · Cited by 50
Zhang, B., Krajcik, J. S., Sutherland, L. M., Wang, L., Wu, J., & Qian, Y. (2005) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-005-1517-8 · Cited by 43
Culture wars in the classroom: Prospective teachers question science
Sullenger, K. S., Turner, S., Caplan, H., Crummey, J., Cuming, R., Charron, C. L., & Corey, B. (2000) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<895::aid-tea3>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Pomeroy, D.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-278
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2066087044
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.3730770302
- The paper
- Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
