The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development
Abstract
This panel study investigates the relationship between green logistics indices, economic, environmental, and social factors in the perspective of Asian emerging economies. This study adopted Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) Model and Dynamic OLS (DOLS) Model methods to test the research hypothesis, catering the problem of endogeneity and serial correlation. The results suggest that logistics operations, particularly LPI2 (efficiency of customs clearance processes), LPI4 (quality of logistics services), and LPI5 (trade and transport‐related infrastructure), are positively and significantly correlated with per capita income, manufacturing value added and trade openness, whereas greater logistics operations are negatively associated with social and environmental problems including, climate change, global warming, carbon emissions, and poisoning atmosphere. In addition, human health is badly affected by heavy smog, acid rainfall, and water pollution. The findings further extend and reveal that political instability, natural disaster, and terrorism are also a primary cause of poor economic growth and environmental sustainability with poor trade and logistics infrastructure. There is very limited empirical work presented in the literature using renewable energy and green ideology to solve macro‐level social and environmental problems, and this study will assist the policy makers and researchers to understand the importance of the green concept in improving countries' social, economic, and environmental performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Supply chain and logistics issues of bio-energy production
Gold, S., & Seuring, S. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.009 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Regional gap and the trend of green finance development in China
Lv, C., Bian, B., Lee, C.-C., & He, Z. (2021) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105476 · Cited by 451
Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Golpira, H., Sharif, A., & Mardani, A. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357 · Cited by 432
Self-citationInvestigating the effects of renewable energy on international trade and environmental quality
Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Belhadi, A., & Mardani, A. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111089 · Cited by 359
Self-citationChowdhury, M. T., Sarkar, A., Paul, S. K., & Moktadir, M. A. (2022) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-020-00166-9 · Cited by 266
Li, Y., & Tian, C. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-31267-0 · Cited by 4
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, S. A. R., Sharif, A., Golpîra, H., & Kumar, A.
- Venue
- Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-06-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1063-1075
- ISSN
- 0968-0802 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2952686683
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 64.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.