The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A socio‐metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another Great Transformation
Abstract
Over the last two million years, humans have colonized almost the entire biosphere on Earth, thereby creating socio‐ecological systems in which fundamental patterns and processes are co‐regulated by socio‐economic and ecological processes. We postulate that the evolution of coupled socio‐ecological systems can be characterized by a sequence of relatively stable configurations, here denoted as ‘socio‐metabolic regimes’, and comparatively rapid transitions between such regimes. We discern three fundamentally different socio‐metabolic regimes: hunter‐gatherers, agrarian societies and industrial society. Transitions between these regimes fundamentally change socio‐ecological interactions, whereas changes and variations within each regime are gradual. Two‐thirds of the world population are currently within a rapid transition from the agrarian to the industrial regime. Many current global sustainability problems are a direct consequence of this transition. The central hypothesis discussed in this article is that industrial society is at least as different from a future sustainable society as it is from the agrarian regime. The challenge of sustainability is, therefore, a fundamental re‐orientation of society and the economy, not the implementation of some technical fixes. Based on empirical data for global resource use (material and energy flows, land use), this essay questions the notion that the promotion of eco‐efficiency is sufficient for achieving sustainability, and outlines the reasons why a transition to a new socio‐metabolic regime is now required. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:taahno]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,487
Canadell, J. G., Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M. R., Field, C. B., Buitenhuis, E. T., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Gillett, N. P., Houghton, R. A., & Marland, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702737104 · Cited by 2,136 · cited 1×
“3%, largely as a result of rising energy consumption and increased economic activity (Canadell et al., 2007).”
BackgroundSmallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture
Netting, R. M. (1993) · doi:10.1515/9781503622067 · Cited by 756
Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect
Herring, H., & Roy, R. (2007) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.11.004 · Cited by 456
Cited by
Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 · Cited by 1,401
The Dark Side of Transformation: Latent Risks in Contemporary Sustainability Discourse
Blythe, J., Silver, J., Evans, L., Armitage, D., Bennett, N. J., Moore, M., Morrison, T. H., & Brown, K. (2018) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.12405 · Cited by 526
Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers
Stringer, L. C., Fraser, E. D. G., Harris, D., Lyon, C., Pereira, L., Ward, C. F. M., & Simelton, E. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.007 · Cited by 325
Ollivier, G., Magda, D., Mazé, A., Plumecocq, G., & Lamine, C. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09952-230205 · Cited by 144
Zatta, A., Clifton‐Brown, J., Robson, P., Hastings, A., & Monti, A. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12054 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Haberl, H., Fischer‐Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Martinez‐Alier, J., & Winiwarter, V.
- Venue
- Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0968-0802 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2094701299
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.