Cited by 2,136Atmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsClimate variability and modelsClimate Change Policy and Economics

Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO 2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks

Open access
Canadell, Josep G., Le Quéré, Corinne, Raupach, Michael R., Field, Christopher B., Buitenhuis, Erik T., Ciais, Philippe, Conway, Thomas J., Gillett, Nathan P. +2 more·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), the largest human contributor to human-induced climate change, is increasing rapidly. Three processes contribute to this rapid increase. Two of these processes concern emissions. Recent growth of the world economy combined with an increase in its carbon intensity have led to rapid growth in fossil fuel CO 2 emissions since 2000: comparing the 1990s with 2000–2006, the emissions growth rate increased from 1.3% to 3.3% y −1 . The third process is indicated by increasing evidence ( P = 0.89) for a long-term (50-year) increase in the airborne fraction (AF) of CO 2 emissions, implying a decline in the efficiency of CO 2 sinks on land and oceans in absorbing anthropogenic emissions. Since 2000, the contributions of these three factors to the increase in the atmospheric CO 2 growth rate have been ≈65 ± 16% from increasing global economic activity, 17 ± 6% from the increasing carbon intensity of the global economy, and 18 ± 15% from the increase in AF. An increasing AF is consistent with results of climate–carbon cycle models, but the magnitude of the observed signal appears larger than that estimated by models. All of these changes characterize a carbon cycle that is generating stronger-than-expected and sooner-than-expected climate forcing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0702737104

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tropical ecosystems store an enormous 340 billion tonnes of carbon, equivalent to more than 40 times the total annual anthropogenic emissions from fossil fuel combustion.

    “Tropical ecosystems store an enormous 340 billion tonnes of carbon (Gibbs et al 2007), equivalent to more than 40 times the total annual anthropogenic emissions from fossil fuel combustion (Canadell et al 2007).”
  • Anthropogenic climate forcing has accelerated since the beginning of the 21st century, mainly due to growing global economy and reduced absorbing efficiency of land and ocean CO2 sinks.

    “The anthropogenic climate forcing has accelerated since the beginning of the 21st century, mainly due to growing global economy and reduced absorbing efficiency of land and ocean CO 2 sinks (Canadell et al., 2007).”
  • The 161 GtC avoided in the AW1 scenario corresponds to 34% of the total 478 GtC emitted by humans between 1850 and 2005.

    “This corresponds to 34% of the total 478 GtC emitted by humans between 1850 and 2005”

    From Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification (2010) · cites this paper as [11]

  • In 2005, land use change accounted for an additional 1.5 GtC emissions.

    “In the same year, land use change (e.g., harvesting of forest products and clearing for agriculture) accounted for an additional 1.5 GtC emissions”

    From Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification (2010) · cites this paper as [11]

  • The 86.5 GtC avoided in the AW2 scenario corresponds to 18% of the total 478 GtC emitted by humans between 1850 and 2005.

    “This corresponds to 18% of the total 478 GtC emitted by humans between 1850 and 2005”

    From Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification (2010) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Pearson PN, Palmer MR (2000) Nature 406:695-699.
  2. Edmonds J, Joos F, Nakicenovic N, Richels RG, Sarmiento J (2004) in The Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Humans, Climate and the Natural World, eds Field CB, Raupach MR (Island Press, Washington, DC), pp 77-102.
  3. Nakicenovic N, Swart S (2000) IPCC Emissions Scenarios (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), p 599.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canadell, J. G., Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M. R., Field, C. B., Buitenhuis, E. T., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Gillett, N. P., Houghton, R. A., & Marland, G.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • School of Environment Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom;
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-11-20
Volume
104
Issue
47
Pages
18866-18870
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2133920545
Cited by
2,136
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 140 · 2014: 132 · 2013: 168 · 2012: 121
FWCI
116.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/C516079/1, bas010013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
atmospheric CO2 growth rate, carbon intensity, economic growth, fossil fuel CO2 emissions, carbon sink, ocean carbon uptake, land carbon uptake, radiative forcing, anthropogenic CO2 emissions
MeSH terms
Atmosphere, Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Fossil Fuels, Time Factors, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review