Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sampling minority groups in health surveys

Kalsbeek, William D.·2003·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

Sampling racial and ethnic minority groups in population‐based health studies presents the statistical designer with a variety of notable challenges, many of which can be traced to the manner in which the sampling frame maps into the set of group members. A brief review of sampling approaches aimed at race/ethnic groups is followed by findings on two particularly important statistical issues one may face when sampling minorities: the implications of the geographic diffusion of minorities within sampled area clusters, and the relative utility of different forms of space and time sampling to deal with sometimes dramatic change over time in the linkage between entries on a sampling frame and members of relatively mobile minority groups. Simulated findings from practical illustrations involving the sampling of Hispanics are presented to address each issue. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.1510

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1985, Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Black and Minority Health
  2. Institute of Medicine, 1999, Leading Health Indicators for Healthy People 2010: Final Report
  3. Institute of Medicine, 2001, Informing the Future: Critical Issues in Health
  4. Perez SM, 1999, Moving up the Economic Ladder: Latino Workers and the Nation's Future Prosperity
  5. Kalton G, 1993, Methodological Issues in AIDS Behavioral Research
  6. BinsonD MoskowitzJ MillsT AndersonK PaulJ StallR CataniaJ.Sampling men who have sex with men: strategies for a telephone survey in urban areas in the United States. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section American Statistical Association1996;68–72.
  7. Higgins DL, 1996, Using formative research to lay the foundation for community level HIV prevention efforts: an example from the AIDS community demonstration projects, Public Health Reports, 111, 28
  8. MacKellar D, 1996, The young men's survey: methods for estimating HIV seroprevalence and risk factors among young men who have sex with men, Public Health Reports, 111, 138
  9. 10.2105/AJPH.91.6.922 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/phr/116.S1.216 · DOI
  11. Lessler JT, 1992, Nonsampling Error in Surveys
  12. 10.2307/2981886 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.002153 · DOI
  14. HartleyHO.Multiple frame surveys. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section American Statistical Association1962;203–206.
  15. Lepkowski JM, 1986, A mean squared error model for dual frame, mixed mode survey design, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 930, 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478352 · DOI
  16. ChoudhryGH.Cost‐variance optimization of dual frame design for estimating proportions. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section American Statistical Association1989;566–571.
  17. 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476695 · DOI
  18. Frank O, 1994, Estimating the size of hidden population values using snowball sampling, Journal of Official Statistics, 10, 53
  19. 10.2307/3096941 · DOI
  20. Kalton G, 1991, Sampling flows of mobile human populations, Survey Methods, 17, 183
  21. IachanR.Sampling in time and space. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section American Statistical Association1989;636–640.
  22. Dennis ML, 1993, Enumerating Homeless Persons: Methods and Data Needs, 167
  23. KaltonG. Introduction to Survey Sampling. Sage 1983. · DOI
  24. National Center for Health Statistics, 1994, Plan and operation of the third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988, Vital Health Statistics, 1
  25. National Center for Health Statistics, 1999, National health interview survey: research for the 1995–2004 redesign, Vital Health Statistics, 2
  26. Waksberg J, 1997, Geographic‐based oversampling in demographic surveys of the United States, Survey Methods, 23, 61
  27. Kish L, 1965, Survey Sampling
  28. Gabler S, 1999, A model‐based justification of Kish's formula for design effects for weighting and clustering, Survey Methods, 25, 105
  29. Spencer BD, 2000, An approximate design effect for unequal weighting when measurements may be correlated with selection probabilities, Survey Methods, 26, 137
  30. WaksbergJ.The effect of stratification with differential sampling rates on attributes of subsets of the population. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section American Statistical Association1973;429–434.
  31. Birnbaum ZW, 1965, Vital and Health Statistics
  32. Sirken MG, 1970, Household surveys with multiplicity, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 257, 10.1080/01621459.1970.10481077 · DOI
  33. Sirken MG, 1972, Stratified sample surveys with multiplicity, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 224, 10.1080/01621459.1972.10481236 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/1401868 · DOI
  35. Johnston HL, 1985, Health for the Nation's Harvesters
  36. Cochran WG, 1977, Sampling Techniques

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kalsbeek, W. D.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-14
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1527-1549
ISSN
  • 0277-6715
  • 1097-0258
Cited by
43
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review