The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating equations for association structures
Abstract
This paper investigates generalized estimating equations for association parameters, which are frequently of interest in family studies, with emphasis on covariance estimation. Separate link functions are used to connect the mean, the scale, and the correlation to linear predictors involving possibly different sets of covariates, and separate estimating equations are proposed for the three sets of parameters. Simulations show that the robust ‘sandwich’ variance estimator and the jackknife variance estimator for the correlation parameters are generally close to the empirical variance for the sample size of 50 clusters. The results contradict Ziegler et al. and Kastner and Ziegler, where the ‘sandwich’ estimator obtained from the software MAREG was shown to be unsuitable for practical usage. The problem appears to arise because the MAREG variance estimator does not account for variability in estimation of the scale parameters, but may be valid with fixed scale. We also find that the formula for the approximate jackknife variance estimator in Ziegler et al. is deficient, resulting in systematic deviations from the fully iterated jackknife variance estimator. A general jackknife formula is provided and performs well in numerical studies. Data from a study on the genetics of alcoholism is used to illustrate the importance of reliable variance estimation in biomedical applications. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Cited by
The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations
Halekoh, U., Højsgaard, S., & Yan, J. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v015.i02 · Cited by 1,907
Self-citationWu, S., Crespi, C. M., & Wong, W. K. (2012) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.004 · Cited by 272
Pekár, S., & Brabec, M. (2018) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.12713 · Cited by 178
A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations
Lu, B., Preisser, J. S., Qaqish, B. F., Suchindran, C., Bangdiwala, S. I., & Wolfson, M. (2007) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00764.x · Cited by 118
den Hartog, G., Vos, E. R. A., van den Hoogen, L. L., van Boven, M., Schepp, R. M., Smits, G., van Vliet, J., Woudstra, L., Wijmenga-Monsuur, A. J., van Hagen, C. C. E., et al. (2021) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciab172 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, J., & Fine, J.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 859-874
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2067272524
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.