The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models
Open accessAbstract
Simulation studies present an important statistical tool to investigate the performance, properties and adequacy of statistical models in pre‐specified situations. One of the most important statistical models in medical research is the proportional hazards model of Cox. In this paper, techniques to generate survival times for simulation studies regarding Cox proportional hazards models are presented. A general formula describing the relation between the hazard and the corresponding survival time of the Cox model is derived, which is useful in simulation studies. It is shown how the exponential, the Weibull and the Gompertz distribution can be applied to generate appropriate survival times for simulation studies. Additionally, the general relation between hazard and survival time can be used to develop own distributions for special situations and to handle flexibly parameterized proportional hazards models. The use of distributions other than the exponential distribution is indispensable to investigate the characteristics of the Cox proportional hazards model, especially in non‐standard situations, where the partial likelihood depends on the baseline hazard. A simulation study investigating the effect of measurement errors in the German Uranium Miners Cohort Study is considered to illustrate the proposed simulation techniques and to emphasize the importance of a careful modelling of the baseline hazard in Cox models. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cited by
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios
Austin, P. C. (2013) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.5705 · Cited by 1,006
SVM-RFE: selection and visualization of the most relevant features through non-linear kernels
Sanz, H., Valim, C., Vegas, E., Oller, J. M., & Reverter, F. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2451-4 · Cited by 804
Austin, P. C. (2016) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7084 · Cited by 542
Debray, T. P. A., Moons, K. G. M., & Riley, R. D. (2018) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1266 · Cited by 212
Augmented backward elimination: a pragmatic and purposeful way to develop statistical models
Dunkler, D., Plischke, M., Leffondré, K., & Heinze, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113677 · Cited by 194
“Weibull distributed survival times T were drawn from { log (U)=0:125 exp Y ð Þ 1⁄2 , where U was a standard uniform random variable [29].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Bender, R., Augustin, T., & Blettner, M.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1713-1723
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2136916987
- Cited by
- 889
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.