Cited by 9Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Estimation of genetic and environmental factors for melanoma onset using population‐based family data

Lindström, L., Pawitan, Y., Reilly, M., Hemminki, K., Lichtenstein, P., Czene, K.·2006·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

Estimation of genetic and environmental contributions to cancers falls in the framework of generalized linear mixed modelling with several random effect components. Computational challenges remain, however, in dealing with binary or survival phenotypes. In this paper, we consider the analysis of melanoma onset in a population of 2.6 million nuclear families in Sweden, for which none of the current survival‐based methodologies is feasible. We treat the disease outcome as a binary phenotype, so that the standard proportional hazard model leads to a generalized linear model with the complementary‐log link function. For rare diseases this link is very close to the probit link, and thus allows the use of marginal likelihood for the estimation of the variance components. We correct for the survival length bias by censoring the parent generation within each family at the time they attain the same cumulative hazard as the child generation, thus improving the validity of the estimates. Our finding that childhood shared environment in addition to genetic factors had a considerable effect on the development of melanoma is consistent with epidemiological studies. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.2266

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The analysis adjusted for birth cohorts, addressing biases due to differences in length of follow-up with study participants in different birth years.

    “We adjusted for birth cohorts, addressing biases due to differences in length of follow-up with study participants in different birth years26.”

    From The Familial Risk of Autism (2014) · cites this paper as [26]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindström, L., Pawitan, Y., Reilly, M., Hemminki, K., Lichtenstein, P., & Czene, K.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Czene, K.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-22
Volume
25
Issue
18
Pages
3110-3123
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2165798496
Cited by
9
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
melanoma, genetic risk factors, environmental risk factors, heritability, nuclear family, generalized linear mixed models, marginal likelihood, variance components, censoring, rare diseases
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Cocarcinogenesis, Environment, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Models, Genetic, Pedigree, Sweden, Models, Statistical, Age of Onset, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review