The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection of important variables and determination of functional form for continuous predictors in multivariable model building
Abstract
In developing regression models, data analysts are often faced with many predictor variables that may influence an outcome variable. After more than half a century of research, the ‘best’ way of selecting a multivariable model is still unresolved. It is generally agreed that subject matter knowledge, when available, should guide model building. However, such knowledge is often limited, and data‐dependent model building is required. We limit the scope of the modelling exercise to selecting important predictors and choosing interpretable and transportable functions for continuous predictors. Assuming linear functions, stepwise selection and all‐subset strategies are discussed; the key tuning parameters are the nominal P‐value for testing a variable for inclusion and the penalty for model complexity, respectively. We argue that stepwise procedures perform better than a literature‐based assessment would suggest. Concerning selection of functional form for continuous predictors, the principal competitors are fractional polynomial functions and various types of spline techniques. We note that a rigorous selection strategy known as multivariable fractional polynomials (MFP) has been developed. No spline‐based procedure for simultaneously selecting variables and functional forms has found wide acceptance. Results of FP and spline modelling are compared in two data sets. It is shown that spline modelling, while extremely flexible, can generate fitted curves with uninterpretable ‘wiggles’, particularly when automatic methods for choosing the smoothness are employed. We give general recommendations to practitioners for carrying out variable and function selection. While acknowledging that further research is needed, we argue why MFP is our preferred approach for multivariable model building with continuous covariates. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R
Wood, S. N. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315370279 · Cited by 13,852
Wood, S. N. (2006) · doi:10.1201/9781420010404 · Cited by 4,953
Cited by
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, G. S. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0698 · Cited by 5,147
Huang, Y.-Q., Liang, C.-H., He, L., Tian, J., Liang, C.-S., Chen, X., Ma, Z.-L., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.65.9128 · Cited by 1,765
Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research
Steyerberg, E. W., Moons, K. G. M., van der Windt, D. A., Hayden, J. A., Perel, P., Schroter, S., Riley, R. D., Hemingway, H., Altman, D. G., & for the PROGRESS Group (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381 · Cited by 1,508
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration
Altman, D. G., McShane, L. M., Sauerbrei, W., & Taube, S. E. (2012) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001216 · Cited by 1,013
Self-citationA review of spline function procedures in R
Perperoglou, A., Sauerbrei, W., Abrahamowicz, M., & Schmid, M. (2019) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0666-3 · Cited by 585
Self-citationflexsurv : A Platform for Parametric Survival Modeling in R
Jackson, C. (2016) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v070.i08 · Cited by 558
Serum iPTH, calcium and phosphate, and the risk of mortality in a European haemodialysis population
Floege, J., Kim, J., Ireland, E., Chazot, C., Drueke, T., de Francisco, A., Kronenberg, F., Marcelli, D., Passlick-Deetjen, J., Schernthaner, G., et al. (2011) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfq219 · Cited by 477
A new variable selection approach using Random Forests
Hapfelmeier, A., & Ulm, K. (2013) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2012.09.020 · Cited by 259
Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models
Hendriksen, J. M. T., Geersing, G. J., Moons, K. G. M., & de Groot, J. A. H. (2013) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.12262 · Cited by 229
Boursi, B., Finkelman, B., Giantonio, B. J., Haynes, K., Rustgi, A. K., Rhim, A. D., Mamtani, R., & Yang, Y.-X. (2017) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.046 · Cited by 202
Collins, G. S., Ogundimu, E. O., Cook, J. A., Manach, Y. L., & Altman, D. G. (2016) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6986 · Cited by 185
Li, F., Xin, H., Zhang, J., Fu, M., Zhou, J., & Lian, Z. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044779 · Cited by 128
“Second, we used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method, 19 which involves regression analysis to perform both variable selection and regularisation.”
MethodThe Shape of the Dose-Response Relationship between Sugars and Caries in Adults
Bernabé, E., Vehkalahti, M. M., Sheiham, A., Lundqvist, A., & Suominen, A. L. (2016) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034515616572 · Cited by 145
The misuse and abuse of statistics in biomedical research
Thiese, M. S., Arnold, Z. C., & Walker, S. D. (2015) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2015.001 · Cited by 87
Wang, Y., Zhao, Z.-J., Kang, X.-R., Bian, T., Shen, Z.-M., Jiang, Y., Sun, B., Hu, H.-B., & Chen, Y.-S. (2020) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.104095 · Cited by 85
Kashyap, A. S., Fernandez-Rodriguez, L., Zhao, Y., Monaco, G., Trefny, M. P., Yoshida, N., Martin, K., Sharma, A., Olieric, N., Shah, P., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.057 · Cited by 76
A comparison of methods to adjust for continuous covariates in the analysis of randomised trials
Kahan, B. C., Rushton, H., Morris, T. P., & Daniel, R. M. (2016) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0141-3 · Cited by 74
Eriksson, L. S. E., Epstein, E., Testa, A. C., Fischerova, D., Valentin, L., Sladkevicius, P., Franchi, D., Frühauf, F., Fruscio, R., Haak, L. A., et al. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.21950 · Cited by 24
Mao, R., & Li, J. (2024) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12920-024-02008-0 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauerbrei, W., Royston, P., & Binder, H.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 5512-5528
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2168051713
- Cited by
- 1,171
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
