The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A mixed‐effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: The NCI method
Open accessAbstract
It is of interest to estimate the distribution of usual nutrient intake for a population from repeat 24‐h dietary recall assessments. A mixed effects model and quantile estimation procedure, developed at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), may be used for this purpose. The model incorporates a Box–Cox parameter and covariates to estimate usual daily intake of nutrients; model parameters are estimated via quasi‐Newton optimization of a likelihood approximated by the adaptive Gaussian quadrature. The parameter estimates are used in a Monte Carlo approach to generate empirical quantiles; standard errors are estimated by bootstrap. The NCI method is illustrated and compared with current estimation methods, including the individual mean and the semi‐parametric method developed at the Iowa State University (ISU), using data from a random sample and computer simulations. Both the NCI and ISU methods for nutrients are superior to the distribution of individual means. For simple (no covariate) models, quantile estimates are similar between the NCI and ISU methods. The bootstrap approach used by the NCI method to estimate standard errors of quantiles appears preferable to Taylor linearization. One major advantage of the NCI method is its ability to provide estimates for subpopulations through the incorporation of covariates into the model. The NCI method may be used for estimating the distribution of usual nutrient intake for populations and subpopulations as part of a unified framework of estimation of usual intake of dietary constituents. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Islami, F., Goding Sauer, A., Miller, K. D., Siegel, R. L., Fedewa, S. A., Jacobs, E. J., McCullough, M. L., Patel, A. V., Ma, J., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21440 · Cited by 1,610
Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data
Subar, A. F., Freedman, L. S., Tooze, J. A., Kirkpatrick, S. I., Boushey, C., Neuhouser, M. L., Thompson, F. E., Potischman, N., Guenther, P. M., Tarasuk, V., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.115.219634 · Cited by 1,047
Self-citationAdded sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among US adults
Yang, Q., Zhang, Z., Gregg, E. W., Flanders, W. D., Merritt, R., & Hu, F. B. (2014) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13563 · Cited by 947
“We estimated the adjusted HRs by comparing the middle values of each quintile (Q) with the lowest quintile as reference (Q5, Q4, Q3, and Q2 vs Q1).(35,38) To examine the association between added sugar intake and CVD mortality by different cut points, ie, less than 10% by the World Health Organization (in line with th…”
Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015
Reedy, J., Lerman, J. L., Krebs-Smith, S. M., Kirkpatrick, S. I., Pannucci, T. E., Wilson, M. M., Subar, A. F., Kahle, L. L., & Tooze, J. A. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.019 · Cited by 822
Self-citationYang, Q., Cogswell, M. E., Flanders, W. D., Hong, Y., Zhang, Z., Loustalot, F., Gillespie, C., Merritt, R., & Hu, F. B. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.339 · Cited by 802
Metadata
- Authors
- Tooze, J. A., Kipnis, V., Buckman, D. W., Carroll, R. J., Freedman, L. S., Guenther, P. M., Krebs‐Smith, S. M., Subar, A. F., & Dodd, K. W.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-22
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 2857-2868
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2146705008
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A mixed‐effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: The NCI method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.4063
- The paper
- Tooze, J. A., Kipnis, V., Buckman, D. W., Carroll, R. J., Freedman, L. S., Guenther, P. M., Krebs‐Smith, S. M., Subar, A. F., & Dodd, K. W. (2010). A mixed‐effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: The NCI method. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.