The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Cardiovascular diseases
Abstract
A surrogate endpoint in a cardiovascular clinical trial is defined as endpoint measured in lieu of some other so‐called ‘true’ endpoint. A surrogate is especially useful if it is easily measured and highly correlated with the true endpoint. Often the ‘true’ endpoint is one with clinical importance to the patient, for example, mortality or a major clinical outcome, while a surrogate is one biologically closer to the process of disease, for example, ejection fraction. Use of the surrogate can often lead to dramatic reductions in sample size and much shorter studies than use of the true endpoint. We discuss several problems common in trials with surrogate endpoints. Most important is the effect of missing data, especially in the face of informative censoring. Possible solutions are the assignment of scores or formal penalties to missing data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harlow, H. F., & Zimmermann, R. R. (1959) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.130.3373.421 · Cited by 951
Cited by
Strimbu, K., & Tavel, J. A. (2010) · Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS · doi:10.1097/coh.0b013e32833ed177 · Cited by 2,062
Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Definition and operational criteria
Prentice, R. L. (1989) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780080407 · Cited by 2,057
Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?
Fleming, T. R., & DeMets, D. L. (1996) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00011 · Cited by 1,651
Yusuf, S. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470010097038 · Cited by 1,014
Criteria for the Validation of Surrogate Endpoints in Randomized Experiments
Buyse, M., & Molenberghs, G. (1998) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533853 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Wittes, J., Lakatos, E., & Probstfield, J.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 415-425
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2004492804
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.