The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulating biologically plausible complex survival data
Open accessAbstract
Simulation studies are conducted to assess the performance of current and novel statistical models in pre‐defined scenarios. It is often desirable that chosen simulation scenarios accurately reflect a biologically plausible underlying distribution. This is particularly important in the framework of survival analysis, where simulated distributions are chosen for both the event time and the censoring time. This paper develops methods for using complex distributions when generating survival times to assess methods in practice. We describe a general algorithm involving numerical integration and root‐finding techniques to generate survival times from a variety of complex parametric distributions, incorporating any combination of time‐dependent effects, time‐varying covariates, delayed entry, random effects and covariates measured with error. User‐friendly Stata software is provided. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261
Cited by
Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods
Morris, T. P., White, I. R., & Crowther, M. J. (2019) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8086 · Cited by 1,305
Self-citationHua, H., Burke, D. L., Crowther, M. J., Ensor, J., Tudur Smith, C., & Riley, R. D. (2017) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7171 · Cited by 113
Self-citationInfante, G., Miceli, R., & Ambrogi, F. (2023) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9931 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Crowther, M. J., & Lambert, P. C.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4118-4134
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2139276809
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
