Knowledge complexity and the performance of inter‐unit knowledge replication structures
Open accessAbstract
Research Summary: Intra‐firm replication of complex knowledge is difficult yet critical to firm growth and the exploitation of competitive advantage. Inter‐unit organizational structures can facilitate the replication of complex knowledge between a source unit and a recipient unit. This study examines how inter‐unit organizational structures perform at different levels of knowledge complexity. We dimensionalize the patterns of information‐processing interactions according to three specific factors: the degree of inter‐unit connectivity, the extent of mirroring between the structure and the knowledge configuration, and coordination mechanisms. Simulation analyses offer a set of novel findings on how the information‐processing and bounded‐rationality concerns of organizational design impact the replication performance of the structures. We derive optimal structures for different levels of knowledge complexity, and articulate their theoretical and practical implications. Managerial Summary: The growth of firms often involves redeployment of their complex knowledge to new subunits or markets, in the context of acquisitions, alliances, or the creation of multinational subsidiaries. Complex knowledge is difficult to imitate, and thus, serves as a source of competitive advantage. However, it is also challenging to replicate within a firm, which limits firms’ ability to redeploy their capabilities in pursuit of new opportunities. A proper design of inter‐unit structures can facilitate the replication of complex knowledge between intra‐firm units. This study examines how the design of inter‐unit structures affects the outcome of this replication. Our results suggest that managers in charge of redeployment efforts should be mindful of the connectivity among units, coordination mechanisms, information overload, and the level of knowledge complexity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Firms have three levers when it comes to structuring information flows: inter-unit connectivity between the source and recipient organizations, the extent of mirroring, and the coordination mechanisms.
“Firms have three levers when it comes to structuring information flows: inter-unit connectivity between the source and recipient organizations, the extent of mirroring, and the coordination mechanisms”
From Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research (2021) · cites this paper as Kim & Anand, 2018
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 83 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Kim, S., & Anand, J. (.
- Affiliations
- Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Sungho
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-30
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1959-1989
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2802856612
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- knowledge replication, knowledge complexity, intra-firm knowledge transfer, coordination mechanisms, information overload, bounded rationality, organizational design, competitive advantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review