The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The character and significance of strategy process research
Abstract
This essay discusses the character and significance of strategy process research. Process research in strategic management is paradigmatically diverse and empirically complex. Strategy process research has been narrow in its focus and its undoubted contribution has sometimes been obscured by the lack of explicit discourse about its analytical foundations. The essay draws on a wide range of social science ideas to lay out a set of internally consistent insights and assumptions to guide thinking and empirical inquiry about the analysis of process issues in strategic management. The essay also provides a guide to the eight papers contained in this special issue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 7,939
A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation
Sewell (1992) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229967 · Cited by 5,282
Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice
Pettigrew, A. M. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.267 · Cited by 4,221
Self-citationBhaskar, R. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203090732 · Cited by 4,012
Towards a dynamic theory of strategy
Porter, M. E. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250121008 · Cited by 3,950
Patterns in Strategy Formation
Mintzberg, H. (1978) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934 · Cited by 3,494
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations.
Perrow, C., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064777 · Cited by 2,704
The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies
Ragin, C. C. (2014) · doi:10.1525/9780520957350 · Cited by 2,130
Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?
Nelson, R. R. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250121006 · Cited by 1,970
Whitbeck, C., & Bhaskar, R. (1977) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184170 · Cited by 1,617
Cited by
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm
Hart, S. L. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258963 · Cited by 4,567
On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810 · Cited by 2,718
The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking
Maitlis, S. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.15993111 · Cited by 1,451
Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective
Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259186 · Cited by 1,282
Metadata
- Authors
- Pettigrew, A. M.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- 5-16
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2167717493
- Cited by
- 1,068
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The character and significance of strategy process research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.4250130903
- The paper
- Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.