The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s
Abstract
It is difficult to get a clear picture of the relative influence of management journals because previous studies have focused on a single sub‐area in the field over a relatively restricted number of years, and/or have used inconsistent criteria to judge journal influence. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine journal influence using citations from 28 journals over the past two decades. The findings show that the top seven journals accounted for 61 percent of all of the citations in the journals included, and that the three journals that showed the greatest increase in influence over the past 20 years were AMJ, AMR , and SMJ . Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For this research, Scopus is utilized.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,725
Competitive advantage, creating and sustaining superior performance
Weil, K. E. (1985) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 10,284
Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance
Ponter, M. E. (1998) · Cited by 5,821
FOREIGN ENTRY, CULTURAL BARRIERS, AND LEARNING
Barkema, H. G., Bell, J., & Pennings, J. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199602)17:2 · Cited by 1,819
On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B
Kerr, S. (1975) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255378 · Cited by 1,585
Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets
Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:1 · Cited by 1,509
Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable
Pfeffer, J. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1993.9402210152 · Cited by 1,404
DETERMINANTS OF FACULTY PAY: AN AGENCY THEORY PERSPECTIVE.
Gómez‐Mejía, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256535 · Cited by 702
The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process
Ellison, G. (2000) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/341868 · Cited by 503
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Cabell DWE, 2000, Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Management
- Coe R, 1969, Evaluating journal publication: perceptions versus reality, AACSB Bulletin, 6, 23
- Niemi AW, 1988, Research productivity of American business schools, 1975–85, Review of Business and Economic Research, 23, 1
- 10.2307/258592 · DOI
- 10.2307/2577563 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 · Cited by 14,329
A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydın, M. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x · Cited by 3,667
“We chose to limit our sources to peer-reviewed journals because these can be considered validated knowledge and are likely to have the highest impact in the field (Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
BackgroundHanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12639 · Cited by 2,550
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005 · Cited by 1,775
Metadata
- Authors
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Podsakoff, Philip M.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 473-488
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2141967394
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- management journals, journal influence, citation analysis, citation impact, top journals, scholarly publishing, 1980s-1990s
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
