The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter?
Abstract
At the center of Schumpeter's theory of competitive behavior is the assertion that competitive advantage will become increasingly more difficult to sustain in a wide range of industries. More recently, this assertion has resurfaced in the notion of hypercompetition. This research examines two large longitudinal samples of firms to discover which industries, if any, exhibit performance that is consonant with Schumpeterian theory and the assertions of hypercompetition. We find support for the argument that over time competitive advantage has become significantly harder to sustain and, further, that the phenomenon is limited neither to high‐technology industries nor to manufacturing industries but is seen across a broad range of industries. We also find evidence that sustained competitive advantage is increasingly a matter not of a single advantage maintained over time but more a matter of concatenating over time a sequence of advantages. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Cited by
Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future
Barreto, I. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309350776 · Cited by 1,948
Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112470848 · Cited by 1,341
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1122 · Cited by 453
Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm‐level competitive advantage?
Lazzarini, S. G. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2204 · Cited by 276
Garrison, G., Wakefield, R. L., & Kim, S. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.03.001 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-25
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 887-911
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1967929303
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.492
- The paper
- Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W. (2005). Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.