Cited by 1,519Business Strategies and Management ResearchStatistical Methods and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues

Hoetker, Glenn·2007·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

The logit and probit models have become critical parts of the management researcher's analytical arsenal, growing rapidly from almost no use in the 1980s to appearing in 15% of all articles published in Strategic Management Journal in 2005. However, a review of three top strategy journals revealed numerous areas in their use and interpretation where current practice fell short of ideal. Failure to understand how these models differ from ordinary least squares can lead researchers to misunderstand their statistical results and draw incorrect conclusions regarding the theory they are testing. Based on a review of the methodological literature and recent empirical papers in three leading strategy journals, this paper identifies four critical issues in their use: interpreting coefficients, modeling interactions between variables, comparing coefficients between groups (e.g., foreign and domestic firms), and measures of model fit. For each issue, the paper provides a background, a review of current practice, and recommendations for best practice. A concluding section presents overall implications for the conduct of research with logit and probit models, which should assist both authors and readers of strategic management research. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.582

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interpretation of interaction effects when using probit regression is inherently difficult, so average marginal effects and graphs are also used.

    “Because the interpretation of interaction effects when using probit regression is inherently difficult (Hoetker, 2007), we also interpret our results using average marginal effects and graphs.”

Authors
Hoetker, G.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Hoetker, Glenn
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-05
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
331-343
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2032639940
Cited by
1,519
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 117 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 83
FWCI
64.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
logit model, probit model, strategic management research, coefficient interpretation, interaction effects, model fit measures, binary response models, ordinary least squares comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review