Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 501

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biodistribution of 1.4‐ and 18‐nm Gold Particles in Rats

Semmler‐Behnke, Manuela, Kreyling, Wolfgang G., Lipka, Jens, Fertsch, Stefanie, Wenk, Alexander, Takenaka, Shinji, Schmid, Günter, Brandau, Wolfgang·2008·Small

Abstract

1.4-nm gold nanoparticles (NPs) are observed to cross the air/blood barrier of the lungs much more efficiently than 18-nm gold NPs (see figure). The NP accumulation pattern in the secondary-target organs differs strongly from those seen after direct intravenous injection. From this, it is hypothesized that NPs interact dynamically with proteins and cells, which determines their accumulation in the various organs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.200800922

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 501

Metadata

Authors
Semmler‐Behnke, M., Kreyling, W. G., Lipka, J., Fertsch, S., Wenk, A., Takenaka, S., Schmid, G., & Brandau, W.
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
2108-2111
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W2106600662
Cited by
501
References
0
FWCI
13.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodistribution of 1.4‐ and 18‐nm Gold Particles in Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.200800922
The paper
Semmler‐Behnke, M., Kreyling, W. G., Lipka, J., Fertsch, S., Wenk, A., Takenaka, S., Schmid, G., & Brandau, W. (2008). Biodistribution of 1.4‐ and 18‐nm Gold Particles in Rats. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200800922

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.