The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Morphology‐Controlled Synthesis of SnO2 Nanotubes by Using 1D Silica Mesostructures as Sacrificial Templates and Their Applications in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Abstract
SnO 2 nanotubes with controllable morphologies are successfully synthesized by using a variety of one‐dimensional (1D) silica mesostructures as effective sacrificial templates. Firstly, 1D silica mesostructures with different morphologies, such as chiral nanorods, nonchiral nanofibers, and helical nanotubes, are readily synthesized in aqueous solution by using the triblock copolymer Pluronic F127 and the cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide as binary templates. Subsequently, the obtained 1D silica mesostructures are used as sacrificial templates to synthesize SnO 2 nanotubes with preserved morphologies via a simple hydrothermal route, resulting in the formation of well‐defined SnO 2 nanotubes with different lengths and unique helical SnO 2 nanotubes with a wealth of conformations. It is revealed that both of the short and long SnO 2 nanotubes showed much better performance as anode materials in lithium‐ion batteries than normal SnO 2 nanopowders, which might be related to the hollow structure of the nanotubes that could alleviate the volume changes and mechanical stress during charging/discharging cycling. Moreover, the capacity and cycling performance of short nanotubes, which showed a specific discharge capacity of 468 mAh g−1 after 30 cycles, are considerably better than those of long nanotubes because of the more robust structure of the short nanotubes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Ba, J., Polleux, J., Antonietti, M., & Niederberger, M. (2005) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200501018 · Cited by 271
Cited by
Review on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries
Goriparti, S., Miele, E., De Angelis, F., Di Fabrizio, E., Proietti Zaccaria, R., & Capiglia, C. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.103 · Cited by 2,092
Mn3O4−Graphene Hybrid as a High-Capacity Anode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries
Wang, H., Cui, L.-F., Yang, Y., Sanchez Casalongue, H., Robinson, J. T., Liang, Y., Cui, Y., & Dai, H. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja105296a · Cited by 1,948
Porous electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries–how to prepare them and what makes them special
Vu, A., Qian, Y., & Stein, A. (2012) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201200320 · Cited by 719
Amorphous CoSnO3@C nanoboxes with superior lithium storage capability
Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Liu, W., Xiao, W., & Lou, X. W. (. (2013) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c2ee23330d · Cited by 353
Lithium alloys and metal oxides as high-capacity anode materials for lithium-ion batteries
Liang, C., Gao, M., Pan, H., Liu, Y., & Yan, M. (2013) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.04.001 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Ye, J., Zhang, H., Yang, R., Li, X., & Qi, L.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-14
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 296-306
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2129705961
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphology‐Controlled Synthesis of SnO2 Nanotubes by Using 1D Silica Mesostructures as Sacrificial Templates and Their Applications in Lithium‐Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.200901815
- The paper
- Ye, J., Zhang, H., Yang, R., Li, X., & Qi, L. (2010). Morphology‐Controlled Synthesis of SnO2 Nanotubes by Using 1D Silica Mesostructures as Sacrificial Templates and Their Applications in Lithium‐Ion Batteries. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200901815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.