Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanopatch‐Targeted Skin Vaccination against West Nile Virus and Chikungunya Virus in Mice

Prow, Tarl W., Chen, Xianfeng, Prow, Natalie A., Fernando, Germain J. P., Tan, Cindy S. E., Raphael, Anthony P., Chang, David, Ruutu, Merja P., Jenkins, Derek W. K., Pyke, Alyssa, Crichton, Michael L., Raphaelli, Kristin, Goh, Lucas Y. H., Frazer, Ian H., Roberts, Michael S., Gardner, Joy, Khromykh, Alexander A., Suhrbier, Andreas, Hall, Roy A., Kendall, Mark A. F.·2010·Small

Abstract

The ‘Nanopatch’ (NP) comprises arrays of densely packed projections with a defined geometry and distribution designed to physically target vaccines directly to thousands of epidermal and dermal antigen presenting cells (APCs). These miniaturized arrays are two orders of magnitude smaller than standard needles—which deliver most vaccines—and are also much smaller than current microneedle arrays. The NP is dry‐coated with antigen, adjuvant, and/or DNA payloads. After the NP was pressed onto mouse skin, a protein payload co‐localized with 91.4 ± 4.1 APC mm−2 (or 2925 in total) representing 52% of the delivery sites within the NP contact area, agreeing well with a probability‐based model used to guide the device design; it then substantially increases as the antigen diffuses in the skin to many more cells. APC co‐localizing with protein payloads rapidly disappears from the application area, suggesting APC migration. The NP also delivers DNA payloads leading to cutaneous expression of encoded proteins within 24 h. The efficiency of NP immunization is demonstrated using an inactivated whole chikungunya virus vaccine and a DNA‐delivered attenuated West Nile virus vaccine. The NP thus offers a needle‐free, versatile, highly effective vaccine delivery system that is potentially inexpensive and simple to use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.201000331

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Prow, T. W., Chen, X., Prow, N. A., Fernando, G. J. P., Tan, C. S. E., Raphael, A. P., Chang, D., Ruutu, M. P., Jenkins, D. W. K., Pyke, A., Crichton, M. L., Raphaelli, K., Goh, L. Y. H., Frazer, I. H., Roberts, M. S., Gardner, J., Khromykh, A. A., Suhrbier, A., Hall, R. A., & Kendall, M. A. F.
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-27
Volume
6
Issue
16
Pages
1776-1784
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W2134552328
Cited by
160
References
1
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanopatch‐Targeted Skin Vaccination against West Nile Virus and Chikungunya Virus in Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201000331
The paper
Prow, T. W., Chen, X., Prow, N. A., Fernando, G. J. P., Tan, C. S. E., Raphael, A. P., Chang, D., Ruutu, M. P., Jenkins, D. W. K., Pyke, A., Crichton, M. L., Raphaelli, K., Goh, L. Y. H., Frazer, I. H., Roberts, M. S., Gardner, J., Khromykh, A. A., Suhrbier, A., Hall, R. A., & Kendall, M. A. F. (2010). Nanopatch‐Targeted Skin Vaccination against West Nile Virus and Chikungunya Virus in Mice. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201000331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.