The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification NanoSAR Development for Cytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
A classification‐based cytotoxicity nanostructure–activity relationship (nanoSAR) is presented based on a set of nine metal oxide nanoparticles to which transformed bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS‐2B) were exposed over a range of concentrations (0.375–200 mg L−1) and exposure times up to 24 h. The nanoSAR is developed using cytotoxicity data from a high‐throughput screening assay that was processed to identify and label toxic (in terms of the propidium iodide uptake of BEAS‐2B cells) versus nontoxic events relative to an unexposed control cell population. Starting with a set of fourteen intuitive but fundamental physicochemical nanoSAR input parameters, a number of models were identified which had a classification accuracy above 95%. The best‐performing model had a 100% classification accuracy in both internal and external validations. This model is based on three descriptors: atomization energy of the metal oxide, period of the nanoparticle metal, and nanoparticle primary size, in addition to nanoparticle volume fraction (in solution). Notwithstanding the success of the present modeling approach with a relatively small nanoparticle library, it is important to recognize that a significantly larger data set would be needed in order to expand the applicability domain and increase the confidence and reliability of data‐driven nanoSARs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jiang, J., Oberdörster, G., & Biswas, P. (2009) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 · Cited by 1,713
Cited by
Muratov, E. N., Bajorath, J., Sheridan, R. P., Tetko, I. V., Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V., Oprea, T. I., Baskin, I. I., Varnek, A., Roitberg, A., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00098a · Cited by 913
Self-citationNel, A., Xia, T., Meng, H., Wang, X., Lin, S., Ji, Z., & Zhang, H. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300022h · Cited by 579
Self-citationBig data and artificial intelligence modeling for drug discovery
Zhu, H. (2020) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-023324 · Cited by 455
Ivask, A., Juganson, K., Bondarenko, O., Mortimer, M., Aruoja, V., Kasemets, K., Blinova, I., Heinlaan, M., Slaveykova, V., & Kahru, A. (2014) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.855831 · Cited by 332
Nel, A. E., Nasser, E., Godwin, H., Avery, D., Bahadori, T., Bergeson, L., Beryt, E., Bonner, J. C., Boverhof, D., Carter, J., et al. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4037927 · Cited by 108
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, R., Rallo, R., George, S., Ji, Z., Nair, S., Nel, A. E., & Cohen, Y.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1118-1126
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2110157951
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification NanoSAR Development for Cytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201002366
- The paper
- Liu, R., Rallo, R., George, S., Ji, Z., Nair, S., Nel, A. E., & Cohen, Y. (2011). Classification NanoSAR Development for Cytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201002366
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.