Cited by 108

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the Use of Alternative Test Strategies for Nanomaterial Safety Assessment

Nel, Andre E., Nasser, Elina, Godwin, Hilary, Avery, David, Bahadori, Tina, Bergeson, Lynn, Beryt, Elizabeth, Bonner, James C., Boverhof, Darrell, Carter, Janet, Castranova, Vince, DeShazo, J. R., Hussain, Saber M., Kane, Agnes B., Klaessig, Frederick, Kuempel, Eileen, Lafranconi, Mark, Landsiedel, Robert, Malloy, Timothy, Miller, Mary Beth, Morris, Jeffery, Moss, Kenneth, Oberdorster, Gunter, Pinkerton, Kent, Pleus, Richard C., Shatkin, Jo Anne, Thomas, Russell, Tolaymat, Thabet, Wang, Amy, Wong, Jeffrey·2013·ACS Nano

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn4037927

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 2007, Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy 2007
  2. Nel A., 2012, Acc. Chem. Res., 46, 607, 10.1021/ar300022h · DOI
  3. Liu R., 2011, Small, 7, 1118, 10.1002/smll.201002366 · DOI
  4. Liu R., 2013, Small, 9, 1842, 10.1002/smll.201201903 · DOI
  5. Meng H., 2009, ACS Nano, 3, 1620, 10.1021/nn9005973 · DOI
  6. Cote I., 2012, Environ. Health Perspect., 120, 1499, 10.1289/ehp.1104870 · DOI
  7. Oberdorster G., 2005, Part. Fibre Toxicol., 2, 1, 10.1186/1743-8977-2-8 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kuempel E. D., 2012, J. Nanopart. Res., 14, 1, 10.1007/s11051-012-1029-8 · DOI
  9. Gangwal S., 2011, Environ. Health Perspect., 119, 1539, 10.1289/ehp.1103750 · DOI
  10. Klein C. L., 2012, Arch. Toxicol., 86, 1137, 10.1007/s00204-012-0834-2 · DOI
  11. Martin M. T., 2011, Biol. Reprod., 85, 327, 10.1095/biolreprod.111.090977 · DOI
  12. Sipes N. S., 2011, Toxicol. Sci., 124, 109, 10.1093/toxsci/kfr220 · DOI
  13. Kleinstreuer N. C., 2013, Toxicol. Sci., 131, 40, 10.1093/toxsci/kfs285 · DOI
  14. Rotroff D. M., 2013, Environ. Health Perspect., 121, 7, 10.1289/ehp.1205065 · DOI
  15. Kleinstreuer N. C., 2011, Environ. Health Perspect., 119, 1596, 10.1289/ehp.1103412 · DOI
  16. Li R., 2013, ACS Nano, 7, 2352, 10.1021/nn305567s · DOI
  17. Wang X., 2010, ACS Nano, 4, 7241, 10.1021/nn102112b · DOI
  18. Wang X., 2011, ACS Nano, 5, 9772, 10.1021/nn2033055 · DOI
  19. Wang X., 2012, Nano Lett., 12, 3050, 10.1021/nl300895y · DOI
  20. Zhang H., 2012, ACS Nano, 6, 4349, 10.1021/nn3010087 · DOI
  21. Pauluhn J., 2010, Toxicol. Sci., 113, 226, 10.1093/toxsci/kfp247 · DOI
  22. Ma-Hock L., 2009, Toxicol. Sci., 112, 468, 10.1093/toxsci/kfp146 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Delorme M. P., 2012, Toxicol. Sci., 128, 449, 10.1093/toxsci/kfs172 · DOI
  24. Shvedova A. A., 2005, Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol., 289, L698, 10.1152/ajplung.00084.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Shvedova A. A., 2008, Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol., 295, L552, 10.1152/ajplung.90287.2008 · DOI
  26. Mercer R., 2008, Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol., 294, L87, 10.1152/ajplung.00186.2007 · DOI
  27. Wang L., 2010, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A, 73, 410, 10.1080/15287390903486550 · DOI
  28. Sargent L. M., 2009, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 50, 708, 10.1002/em.20529 · DOI
  29. Sargent L. M., 2012, Mutat. Res., 745, 28, 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.11.017 · DOI
  30. Current Intelligence Bulletin 65: Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers; C.f.D.C.a.P. Department of Health and Human Services, National Occupational Safety and Health, Editor 2013.
  31. Warshaw J., 2012, Dose-Response, 10, 384, 10.2203/dose-response.10-030.Warshaw · DOI
  32. Hamilton R. F., 2012, Inhal. Toxicol., 24, 995, 10.3109/08958378.2012.745633 · DOI
  33. Porter D. W., 2013, Toxicol. Sci., 131, 179, 10.1093/toxsci/kfs261 · DOI
  34. Sager T. M., 2013, Nanotoxicology
  35. Hamilton R. F., 2013, Inhal. Toxicol., 25, 199, 10.3109/08958378.2013.775197 · DOI
  36. Hamilton R. F., 2009, Part. Fibre Toxicol., 6, 35, 10.1186/1743-8977-6-35 · DOI
  37. Landsiedel R., 2010, Adv. Mater., 22, 2601, 10.1002/adma.200902658 · DOI
  38. Duffin R., 2007, Inhal. Toxicol., 19, 849, 10.1080/08958370701479323 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Rushton E. K., 2010, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A, 73, 445, 10.1080/15287390903489422 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Monteiller C., 2007, Occup. Environ. Med., 64, 609, 10.1136/oem.2005.024802 · DOI
  41. Donaldson K., 2008, Inhal. Toxicol., 20, 53, 10.1080/08958370701758742 · DOI
  42. Xia T., 2008, ACS Nano, 2, 2121, 10.1021/nn800511k · DOI
  43. Xia T., 2011, ACS Nano, 5, 1223, 10.1021/nn1028482 · DOI
  44. Leist M., 2013, Arch. Toxicol., 87, 563, 10.1007/s00204-013-1038-0 · DOI
  45. Slikker W., 2004, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 201, 203, 10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.019 · DOI
  46. 2011, Multiple-Path Particle Deposition (MPPD 2.1): A Model for Human and Rat Airway Particle Dosimetry
  47. Hinderliter P. M., 2010, Part. Fibre Toxicol., 7, 36, 10.1186/1743-8977-7-36 · DOI
  48. Oberdorster G., 2012, Environ. Health Perspect., 120, A13, 10.1289/ehp.1104320 · DOI
  49. 2009, Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment
  50. Judson R. S., 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 5979, 10.1021/es102150z · DOI
  51. Quintero F. A., 2012, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51, 16101, 10.1021/ie301079r · DOI
  52. Current Intelligence Bulletin 63: Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide; C.f.D.C.a.P. Department of Health and Human Services, National Occupational Safety and Health, Editor 2011, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  53. Naumann B. D., 1996, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 57, 33, 10.1080/15428119691015197 · DOI
  54. Ader A. W., 2005, Chem. Health Safety, 20, 10.1016/j.chs.2005.01.016 · DOI
  55. Zalk D. M., 2008, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 5, 330, 10.1080/15459620801997916 · DOI
  56. Kuempel E. D., 2007, Nanotechnology: Toxicological Issues and Environmental Safety, 119, 10.1007/978-1-4020-6076-2_8 · DOI
  57. Sobels F. H., 1977, Mutat. Res., Environ. Mutagen. Relat. Subj., 46, 245
  58. Maier M. S., 2011, Toxicol. Mech. Methods, 21, 76, 10.3109/15376511003638280 · DOI
  59. Erdely A., 2011, J. Occup. Environ. Med., 53, S80, 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821ad724 · DOI
  60. Schubauer-Berigan M. K., 2011, J. Occup. Environ. Med., 53, S62, 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1e2c · DOI
  61. Bonner J. C., 2013, Environ. Health Perspect., 121, 676, 10.1289/ehp.1205693 · DOI
  62. Judson R., 2013, Altex, 30, 51, 10.14573/altex.2013.1.051 · DOI
  63. 2012, A Research Strategy for Environmental, Health, and Safety Aspects of Engineered Nanomaterials
  64. 2006, ISO Guide 35:2006: Reference Materials—General and Statistical Principles for Certification
  65. Schulte P. A., 2010, J. Nanopart. Res., 12, 1971, 10.1007/s11051-010-0008-1 · DOI
  66. 2012, Expert Panel on the Integrated Testing of Pesticides, Integrating Emerging Technologies into Chemical Safety Assessment

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 108

Metadata

Authors
Nel, A. E., Nasser, E., Godwin, H., Avery, D., Bahadori, T., Bergeson, L., Beryt, E., Bonner, J. C., Boverhof, D., Carter, J., Castranova, V., DeShazo, J. R., Hussain, S. M., Kane, A. B., Klaessig, F., Kuempel, E., Lafranconi, M., Landsiedel, R., Malloy, T., Miller, M. B., Morris, J., Moss, K., Oberdorster, G., Pinkerton, K., Pleus, R. C., Shatkin, J. A., Thomas, R., Tolaymat, T., Wang, A., & Wong, J.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2013-08-07
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
6422-6433
ISSN
  • 1936-0851
  • 1936-086X
Cited by
108
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the Use of Alternative Test Strategies for Nanomaterial Safety Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn4037927
The paper
Nel, A. E., Nasser, E., Godwin, H., Avery, D., Bahadori, T., Bergeson, L., Beryt, E., Bonner, J. C., Boverhof, D., Carter, J., Castranova, V., DeShazo, J. R., Hussain, S. M., Kane, A. B., Klaessig, F., Kuempel, E., Lafranconi, M., Landsiedel, R., Malloy, T., . . . Wong, J. (2013). A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the Use of Alternative Test Strategies for Nanomaterial Safety Assessment. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn4037927