The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Assessment of the Comparative Nanoparticle‐Uptake Efficiency of a Range of Cell Lines
Open accessAbstract
The mechanism(s) of nanoparticle–cell interactions are still not understood. At present there is little knowledge of the relevant length‐ and timescales for nanoparticle intracellular entry and localization within cells, or the cell‐specificity of nanoparticle uptake and localisation. Here, the effect of particle size on the in‐vitro intracellular uptake of model fluorescent carboxyl‐modified polystyrene nanoparticles is investigated in various cell lines. A range of micro‐ and nanoparticles of defined sizes (40 nm to 2 μm) are incubated with a series of cell types, including HeLa and A549 epithelial cells, 1321N1 astrocytes, HCMEC D3 endothelial cells, and murine RAW 264.7 macrophages. Techniques such as confocal microscopy and flow cytometry are used to study particle uptake and subcellular localisation, making significant efforts to ensure reproducibility in a semiquantitative approach. The results indicate that internalization of (nano)particles is highly size‐dependent for all cell lines studied, and the kinetics of uptake for the same type of nanoparticle varies in the different cell types. Interestingly, even cells not specialized for phagocytosis are able to internalize the larger nanoparticles. Intracellular uptake of all sizes of particles is observed to be highest in RAW 264.7 cells (a specialized phagocytic cell line) and the lowest in the HeLa cells. These results suggest that (nano)particle uptake might not follow commonly defined size limits for uptake processes, and highlight the variability of uptake kinetics for the same material in different cell types. These conclusions have important implications for the assessment of the safety of nanomaterials and for the potential biomedical applications of nanoparticles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways
Gratton, S. E. A., Ropp, P. A., Pohlhaus, P. D., Luft, J. C., Madden, V. J., Napier, M. E., & DeSimone, J. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801763105 · Cited by 2,918
Yin Win, K., & Feng, S.-S. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.050 · Cited by 1,452
Vu, K., Weksler, B., Romero, I., Couraud, P.-O., & Gelli, A. (2009) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00240-09 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Nanoparticle Size and Surface Chemistry Determine Serum Protein Adsorption and Macrophage Uptake
Walkey, C. D., Olsen, J. B., Guo, H., Emili, A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2084338 · Cited by 1,926
Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters
Shang, L., Nienhaus, K., & Nienhaus, G. U. (2014) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-12-5 · Cited by 1,316
Interaction of nanoparticles with proteins: relation to bio-reactivity of the nanoparticle
Saptarshi, S. R., Duschl, A., & Lopata, A. L. (2013) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-11-26 · Cited by 1,079
Nanoparticle Adhesion to the Cell Membrane and Its Effect on Nanoparticle Uptake Efficiency
Lesniak, A., Salvati, A., Santos-Martinez, M. J., Radomski, M. W., Dawson, K. A., & Åberg, C. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja309812z · Cited by 852
Self-citationJian, C., Wu, T., Wang, L., Gao, C., Fu, Z., Zhang, Q., & Shi, C. (2024) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202309279 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- dos Santos, T., Varela, J., Lynch, I., Salvati, A., & Dawson, K. A.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3341-3349
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2126622563
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Assessment of the Comparative Nanoparticle‐Uptake Efficiency of a Range of Cell Lines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201101076
- The paper
- dos Santos, T., Varela, J., Lynch, I., Salvati, A., & Dawson, K. A. (2011). Quantitative Assessment of the Comparative Nanoparticle‐Uptake Efficiency of a Range of Cell Lines. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201101076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.