The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxicity of Silver Nanoparticles in Macrophages
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (nanosilver) are broadly used today in textiles, food packaging, household devices and bioapplications, prompting a better understanding of their toxicity and biological interactions. In particular, the cytotoxicity of nanosilver with respect to mammalian cells remains unclear, because such investigations can be biased by the nanosilver coatings and the lack of particle size control. Here, nanosilver of well‐defined size (5.7 to 20.4 nm) supported on inert nanostructured silica is produced using flame aerosol technology. The cytotoxicity of the prepared nanosilver with respect to murine macrophages is assessed in vitro because these cells are among the first to confront nanosilver upon its intake by mammals. The silica support facilitates the dispersion and stabilization of the prepared nanosilver in biological suspensions, and no other coating or functionalization is applied that could interfere with the biointeractions of nanosilver. Detailed characterization of the particles by X‐ray diffraction and electron microscopy reveals that the size of the nanosilver is well controlled. Smaller nanosilver particles release or leach larger fractions of their mass as Ag+ ions upon dispersion in water. This strongly influences the cytotoxicity of the nanosilver when incubated with murine macrophages. The size of the nanosilver dictates its mode of cytotoxicity (Ag+ ion‐specific and/or particle‐specific). The toxicity of small nanosilver (<10 nm) is mostly mediated by the released Ag+ ions. The influence of such ions on the toxicity of nanosilver decreases with increasing nanosilver size (>10 nm). Direct silver nanoparticle–macrophage interactions dominate the nanosilver toxicity at sizes larger than 10 nm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage
Li, N., Sioutas, C., Cho, A., Schmitz, D., Misra, C., Sempf, J., Wang, M., Oberley, T., Froines, J., & Nel, A. (2003) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.6000 · Cited by 2,097
Brunner, T. J., Wick, P., Manser, P., Spohn, P., Grass, R. N., Limbach, L. K., Bruinink, A., & Stark, W. J. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es052069i · Cited by 1,385
Kittler, S., Greulich, C., Diendorf, J., Köller, M., & Epple, M. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm100023p · Cited by 1,126
Cited by
Silver Nanoparticle-Mediated Cellular Responses in Various Cell Lines: An in Vitro Model
Zhang, X.-F., Shen, W., & Gurunathan, S. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17101603 · Cited by 308
Wang, L., Zhang, T., Li, P., Huang, W., Tang, J., Wang, P., Liu, J., Yuan, Q., Bai, R., Li, B., et al. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b02483 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Pratsinis, A., Hervella, P., Leroux, J., Pratsinis, S. E., & Sotiriou, G. A.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-18
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2576-2584
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2136152938
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity of Silver Nanoparticles in Macrophages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201202120
- The paper
- Pratsinis, A., Hervella, P., Leroux, J., Pratsinis, S. E., & Sotiriou, G. A. (2013). Toxicity of Silver Nanoparticles in Macrophages. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201202120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.