The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxygen‐Doped Nickel Iron Phosphide Nanocube Arrays Grown on Ni Foam for Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis
Abstract
A rationally designed oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalyst with advanced structural and compositional superiority is highly desirable to optimize electrocatalytic performance. Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) with adjustable element compositions and accessible porous structures represent a promising precursor for the preparation of OER catalysts. Herein, oxygen‐doped nickel iron phosphide nanocube arrays (Ni 2 P/(NiFe)2 P(O) NAs) grown on Ni foam is rationally designed and fabricated from PBAs. The porous structure and the synergistic effect of Ni and Fe enable superior electrocatalytic performance and stability toward the OER in alkaline electrolytes. Density functional theory calculations reveal that Fe‐incorporated Ni 2 P can generate new active sites on the Fe atoms, and the energy barriers of the intermediates and products are decreased efficiently in the presence of surface doped oxygen, both processes are crucial factors for enhanced catalytic performances. In 1 m KOH, the Ni 2 P/(NiFe)2 P(O) NAs afford current densities of 10 and 800 mA cm−2 at overpotentials of 150 and 530 mV, respectively, which outperform the commercial noble metal IrO 2. Ni 2 P/(NiFe)2 P(O) NAs also have long‐term stability over 100 h at a high current density. The present approach may provide a new avenue for the controlled assembly of nanoarrays for energy storage and conversion applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives
Suen, N.-T., Hung, S.-F., Quan, Q., Zhang, N., Xu, Y.-J., & Chen, H. M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00328a · Cited by 6,307
Homogeneously dispersed multimetal oxygen-evolving catalysts
Zhang, B., Zheng, X., Voznyy, O., Comin, R., Bajdich, M., García-Melchor, M., Han, L., Xu, J., Liu, M., Zheng, L., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1525 · Cited by 2,447
Self-citationToward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis
Hong, W. T., Risch, M., Stoerzinger, K. A., Grimaud, A., Suntivich, J., & Shao-Horn, Y. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03869j · Cited by 2,089
Yang, Y., Lin, Z., Gao, S., Su, J., Lun, Z., Xia, G., Chen, J., Zhang, R., & Chen, Q. (2017) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02573 · Cited by 423
Cited by
Zhou, G., Li, M., Li, Y., Dong, H., Sun, D., Liu, X., Xu, L., Tian, Z., & Tang, Y. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201905252 · Cited by 348
Self-citationJiang, D., Xu, S., Quan, B., Liu, C., Lu, Y., Zhu, J., Tian, D., & Li, D. (2021) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.01.084 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Xi, W., Yan, G., Lang, Z., Ma, Y., Tan, H., Zhu, H., Wang, Y., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-21
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- e1802204-e1802204
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2892186367
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxygen‐Doped Nickel Iron Phosphide Nanocube Arrays Grown on Ni Foam for Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201802204
- The paper
- Xi, W., Yan, G., Lang, Z., Ma, Y., Tan, H., Zhu, H., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). Oxygen‐Doped Nickel Iron Phosphide Nanocube Arrays Grown on Ni Foam for Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201802204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.