The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mesoporous Silica‐Based Materials with Bactericidal Properties
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial infections are the main cause of chronic infections and even mortality. In fact, due to extensive use of antibiotics and, then, emergence of antibiotic resistance, treatment of such infections by conventional antibiotics has become a major concern worldwide. One of the promising strategies to treat infection diseases is the use of nanomaterials. Among them, mesoporous silica materials (MSMs) have attracted burgeoning attention due to high surface area, tunable pore/particle size, and easy surface functionalization. This review discusses how one can exploit capacities of MSMs to design and fabricate multifunctional/controllable drug delivery systems (DDSs) to combat bacterial infections. At first, the emergency of bacterial and biofilm resistance toward conventional antimicrobials is described and then how nanoparticles exert their toxic effects upon pathogenic cells is discussed. Next, the main aspects of MSMs (e.g., physicochemical properties, multifunctionality, and biosafety) which one should consider in the design of MSM‐based DDSs against bacterial infections are introduced. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of all the papers published dealing with the use of MSMs for delivery of antibacterial chemicals (antimicrobial agents functionalized/adsorbed on mesoporous silica (MS), MS‐loaded with antimicrobial agents, gated MS‐loaded with antimicrobial agents, MS with metal‐based nanoparticles, and MS‐loaded with metal ions) is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Magiorakos, A.-P., Srinivasan, A., Carey, R. B., Carmeli, Y., Falagas, M. E., Giske, C. G., Harbarth, S., Hindler, J. F., Kahlmeter, G., Olsson-Liljequist, B., et al. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x · Cited by 14,449
Lewis, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306 · Cited by 1,858
Polymeric materials with antimicrobial activity
Muñoz-Bonilla, A., & Fernández-García, M. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.005 · Cited by 1,221
Hidalgo, G., Burns, A., Herz, E., Hay, A. G., Houston, P. L., Wiesner, U., & Lion, L. W. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01220-09 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Metal–Organic-Framework-Based Materials for Antimicrobial Applications
Li, R., Chen, T., & Pan, X. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09617 · Cited by 555
Shadmani, N., Makvandi, P., Parsa, M., Azadi, A., Nedaei, K., Mozafari, N., Poursina, N., Mattoli, V., Tay, F. R., Maleki, A., et al. (2023) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00755 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernardos, A., Piacenza, E., Sancenón, F., Hamidi, M., Maleki, A., Turner, R. J., & Martínez‐Máñez, R.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-29
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- e1900669-e1900669
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2942659903
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesoporous Silica‐Based Materials with Bactericidal Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201900669
- The paper
- Bernardos, A., Piacenza, E., Sancenón, F., Hamidi, M., Maleki, A., Turner, R. J., & Martínez‐Máñez, R. (2019). Mesoporous Silica‐Based Materials with Bactericidal Properties. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201900669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.