The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Ternary Molten Salt Approach for Direct Regeneration of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode
Abstract
Recycling spent lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) is an urgent task in view of the resource shortage and environmental concerns. Here, a facile ternary molten salt approach is presented for efficiently regenerating the LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 (NCM523) cathode of spent LIBs. Such an approach involves the treatment of spent cathode powder in the ternary molten salt at a moderate temperature (400 °C) and subsequent annealing in oxygen. The Li loss and degraded phases in spent NCM that cause the capacity decay can be fully remedied after the regeneration process. As a result, the regenerated cathode delivers a reversible capacity of 160 mAh g−1 at 0.5 C with retention of 93.7% after 100 cycles and maintains a high capacity of 132 mAh g−1 at a high rate of 5 C. The electrochemical performance of regenerated NCM cathode is compared favorably to the fresh NCM cathode, which demonstrates the feasibility of the molten salt approach to directly regenerate spent NCM cathode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recycling End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries
Chen, M., Ma, X., Chen, B., Arsenault, R., Karlson, P., Simon, N., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.014 · Cited by 1,316
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries
Ciez, R. E., & Whitacre, J. F. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0222-5 · Cited by 965
Effective regeneration of anode material recycled from scrapped Li-Ion Batteries
Zhang, J., Li, X., Song, D., Miao, Y., Song, J., & Zhang, L. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.039 · Cited by 197
Cited by
Mao, J., Ye, C., Zhang, S., Xie, F., Zeng, R., Davey, K., Guo, Z., & Qiao, S. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d2ee00162d · Cited by 365
Wang, J., Li, D., Zeng, W., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Li, Z., Li, C., & Mu, S. (2025) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2024.11.016 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, Z., Wen, Z., Xu, Y., Zheng, Z., Bai, M., Zhang, N., Jia, C., Wu, H. B., & Chen, G.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-02-18
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- e2106719-e2106719
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W4213268923
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Ternary Molten Salt Approach for Direct Regeneration of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.202106719
- The paper
- Qin, Z., Wen, Z., Xu, Y., Zheng, Z., Bai, M., Zhang, N., Jia, C., Wu, H. B., & Chen, G. (2022). A Ternary Molten Salt Approach for Direct Regeneration of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202106719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.