Cited by 73

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrostatic Charge‐Mediated Apoptotic Vesicle Biodistribution Attenuates Sepsis by Switching Neutrophil NETosis to Apoptosis

Ou, Qianmin, Tan, Lingping, Shao, Yiting, Lei, Fangcao, Huang, Weiying, Yang, Ning, Qu, Yan, Cao, Zeyuan, Niu, Luhan, Liu, Yao, Kou, Xiaoxing, Shi, Songtao·2022·Small

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy can attenuate organ damage and reduce mortality in sepsis; however, the detailed mechanism is not fully elucidated. In this study, it is shown that MSC‐derived apoptotic vesicles (apoVs) can ameliorate multiple organ dysfunction and improve survival in septic mice. Mechanistically, it is found that tail vein‐infused apoVs mainly accumulate in the bone marrow of septic mice via electrostatic charge interactions with positively charged neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Moreover, apoVs switch neutrophils NETosis to apoptosis via the apoV‐Fas ligand (FasL)‐activated Fas pathway. In summary, these findings uncover a previously unknown role of apoVs in sepsis treatment and an electrostatic charge‐directed target therapeutic mechanism, suggesting that cell death is associated with disease development and therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.202200306

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1182/blood.2019000067 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.04.003 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/smll.202006123 · DOI
  4. Dos S. C., 2022, Eur. Respir. J., 1, 59
  5. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01191 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/scrt385 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41422-018-0070-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1021/acsnano.1c03517 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/smll.201801674 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s41586-020-2394-6 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.050 · DOI
  12. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046677 · DOI
  13. 10.1182/blood-2016-09-741298 · DOI
  14. 10.1182/blood-2013-09-526707 · DOI
  15. 10.1182/blood.2019001347 · DOI
  16. 10.1096/fj.201901360R · DOI
  17. 10.1002/smll.201801650 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113961 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/jev2.12160 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/smll.201401803 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6119 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41419-021-03883-6 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.tips.2020.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/jev2.12109 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1128/IAI.00942-19 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/smll.202003899 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/20013078.2020.1713527 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/smll.201903761 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/s41586-019-1167-6 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.042 · DOI
  31. 10.1182/blood.2020009957 · DOI
  32. 10.1182/blood.2019002329 · DOI
  33. 10.2147/IJN.S283164 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/smll.202007551 · DOI
  35. Sakurai K., 2017, In Vivo, 31, 1051
  36. 10.1038/s41419-020-2582-1 · DOI
  37. 10.7150/thno.60143 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s10456-020-09720-2 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.03.004 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41556-020-0575-z · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101250 · DOI
  42. 10.1096/fj.201701006R · DOI
  43. 10.1182/blood.2021011525 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41591-020-1050-x · DOI
  45. 10.1160/TH10-05-0269 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3584-0_17 · DOI
  47. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00024 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41467-019-09160-7 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/0963689719842162 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ou, Q., Tan, L., Shao, Y., Lei, F., Huang, W., Yang, N., Qu, Y., Cao, Z., Niu, L., Liu, Y., Kou, X., & Shi, S.
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-15
Volume
18
Issue
20
ISSN
  • 1613-6810
  • 1613-6829
Cited by
73
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review