Cited by 39Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceNanomaterials for catalytic reactions

Kinetic‐Modulated Crystal Phase of Ru for Hydrogen Oxidation

Zhang, Juntao, Cao, Maofeng, Li, Xiaotong, Xu, Yong, Zhao, Wei, Chen, Ligang, Chang, Yu‐Chung, Pao, Chih‐Wen +2 more·2023·Small

Abstract

Crystal‐phase‐engineering provides a powerful strategy for regulating the catalytic performance yet remains great challenge. Herein, the kinetic‐modulated crystal‐phase‐control of Ru nanosheet assemblies (Ru NAs) is demonstrated by simply altering the concentration of citric acid (CA). Detailed experimental results reveal that high concentration of CA retards the growth kinetics and thus leads to the formation of metastable face‐centered cubic (fcc) Ru NAs, while low concentration of CA results in the fast growth kinetics and the preferential formation of Ru NAs with stable hexagonal close packed (hcp) phase. Moreover, Ru NAs with different phases are used as catalyst for hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) to evaluate the effects of crystal phase on catalytic performance. Impressively, Ru NAs with fcc phase display a mass activity of 2.75 A mg Ru −1 at 50 mV, which is much higher than those of Ru NAs with fcc/hcp (1.02 A mg Ru −1 ) and hcp (0.74 A mg Ru −1 ) phases. Theoretical calculations show that fcc Ru NAs display weaker adsorption toward * H and lower energy barrier toward the rate‐determining step (RDS) during HOR. This work provides a facile strategy for regulating the crystal phase of Ru nanocrystals, which may attract rapid interests of researchers in materials, chemistry, and catalysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.202207038

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Cao, M., Li, X., Xu, Y., Zhao, W., Chen, L., Chang, Y., Pao, C., Hu, Z., & Huang, X.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • State Power Investment Corporation (China) (CN)
  • National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (TW)
  • Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Yong
  • Chen, Ligang
  • Huang, Xiaoqing
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-02-08
Volume
19
Issue
19
Pages
e2207038-e2207038
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W4319656970
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Small (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22025108, U21A20327, 22121001)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M682083)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholars (2021B1515020081)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Keywords
crystal phase control, hydrogen oxidation, citric acid concentration, growth kinetics, phase engineering, hydrogen adsorption, rate-determining step, electrocatalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review