Using software trails to reconstruct the evolution of software
Abstract
This paper describes a method to recover the evolution of a software system using its software trails: information left behind by the contributors to the development process of the product, such as mailing lists, Web sites, version control logs, software releases, documentation, and the source code. This paper demonstrates the use of this method by recovering the evolution of Ximian Evolution, a mail client for Unix. By extracting useful facts stored in these software trails and correlating them, it was possible to provide a detailed view of the history of this project. This view provides interesting insight into how an open source software project evolves and some of the practices used by its software developers. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each module has one or more maintainers who supervise development, coordinate and integrate commits.
“Cada módulo tiene uno o más mantenedores que supervisan el desarrollo, coordinan e integran los commits(German, 2004).”
From Desarrollo Floss y gobernanza de pares: el caso del entorno de escritorio Gnome (2020) · cites this paper as German, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Desarrollo Floss y gobernanza de pares: el caso del entorno de escritorio Gnome
Zanotti, A., & Vélez, J. G. (2020) · International Journal of Innovation · doi:10.5585/iji.v8i3.17114 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- German, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 367-384
- ISSN
- 1532-060X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-0618
- OpenAlex
- W2027576706
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- software evolution, open source software, mailing lists, software release history, developer practices, historical reconstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review