The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Screening of 2D Materials and Rational Design of Heterojunctions for Water Splitting Photocatalysts
Abstract
As the energy crisis and environmental issues become increasingly serious, photocatalytic water splitting has received extensive attention as a promising method for the production of clean energy. However, available photocatalysts still have a long way to go. In light of the inherent advantages of 2D materials, reducing the thickness of nanosheets to monolayers is an effective strategy to achieve high photocatalytic activity. In this work, over 50 000 inorganic compounds from the Materials Project Database are screened, and 205 layered materials are obtained as candidates for water splitting photocatalysts. By exfoliating those layered materials and further examination, 36 kinds of 2D monolayers with validated stability and appropriate band edge position are achieved. To further enhance the photocatalytic activity, type‐II van der Waals heterostructures are fabricated according to structure and band edge position, and show ideal band edge positions with effective spatial separation of electrons and holes. From layered materials to 2D monolayers and then to type‐II heterojunctions, a high‐throughput computational materials design framework is proposed to gradually enhance the quantum efficiency and performance for photocatalytic water splitting. This screening algorithm exhibits excellent credibility and feasibility, and meanwhile provides substantial candidate catalysts for consequent experimental investigations on photocatalytic water splitting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094
Roles of Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis
Yang, J., Wang, D., Han, H., & Li, C. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300227e · Cited by 2,848
Belsky, A., Hellenbrandt, M., Karen, V. L., & Luksch, P. (2002) · Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science · doi:10.1107/s0108768102006948 · Cited by 1,379
Cited by
Material Design for Photocatalytic Water Splitting from a Theoretical Perspective
Fu, C., Wu, X., & Yang, J. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802106 · Cited by 426
Wan, Y., Wang, L., Xu, H., Wu, X., & Yang, J. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c00564 · Cited by 363
Wang, S., Tian, H., Ren, C., Yu, J., & Sun, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30614-3 · Cited by 282
Use of metamodels for rapid discovery of narrow bandgap oxide photocatalysts
Mai, H., Le, T. C., Hisatomi, T., Chen, D., Domen, K., Winkler, D. A., & Caruso, R. A. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103068 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Wu, D., Zhang, X., Zhao, X., & Zhou, Z.
- Venue
- Small Methods
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2366-9608 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797706191
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Screening of 2D Materials and Rational Design of Heterojunctions for Water Splitting Photocatalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smtd.201700359
- The paper
- Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Wu, D., Zhang, X., Zhao, X., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Computational Screening of 2D Materials and Rational Design of Heterojunctions for Water Splitting Photocatalysts. Small Methods. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.