The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Water Splitting
Abstract
Various photocatalysts have been developed for photocatalytic water splitting—one of the most important processes that produces dihydrogen as clean energy for fuel cells. The successful achievements for this application are based mainly on transition metal oxides and some metal sulfides/nitrides. Recently, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), a class of hybrid functional materials comprising organic backbone tethered infinitively in limitless way by metal‐oxide clusters, both of which can be customized accurately at the molecular level for targeted applications, have been able to photocatalytically degrade water. Herein, it is first aimed to comprehensively review fundamentals of water splitting catalyzed by semiconductor photocatalysts, which casts light on understanding of challenges in this area, thus providing strategies for development, if not rational design, of visible‐light‐driven MOFs that are capable of degrading water to hydrogen and oxygen. The recent advancements of using MOF photocatalysts for water splitting are further described in a way that benchmark achievements and limitations are considered so that the readers can imagine the big picture in this field and pay considerable attention to future solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Water photolysis at 12.3% efficiency via perovskite photovoltaics and Earth-abundant catalysts
Luo, J., Im, J.-H., Mayer, M. T., Schreier, M., Nazeeruddin, M. K., Park, N.-G., Tilley, S. D., Fan, H. J., & Grätzel, M. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258307 · Cited by 2,509
Hydrogen as an energy carrier: Prospects and challenges
Mazloomi, K., & Gomes, C. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.028 · Cited by 1,736
Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks
Wilmer, C. E., Leaf, M., Lee, C. Y., Farha, O. K., Hauser, B. G., Hupp, J. T., & Snurr, R. Q. (2012) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1192 · Cited by 1,439
Xu, H.-Q., Hu, J., Wang, D., Li, Z., Zhang, Q., Luo, Y., Yu, S.-H., & Jiang, H.-L. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b08773 · Cited by 1,166
Yan, Y., Li, C., Wu, Y., Gao, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d0ta03749d · Cited by 260
Cited by
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
Multifunctional metal–organic framework catalysts: synergistic catalysis and tandem reactions
Huang, Y.-B., Liang, J., Wang, X.-S., & Cao, R. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00250a · Cited by 1,908
Pristine Metal–Organic Frameworks and their Composites for Energy Storage and Conversion
Liang, Z., Qu, C., Guo, W., Zou, R., & Xu, Q. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201702891 · Cited by 787
Interface-Assisted Synthesis of 2D Materials: Trend and Challenges
Dong, R., Zhang, T., & Feng, X. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00056 · Cited by 710
Kampouri, S., & Stylianou, K. C. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b00332 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, H. L.
- Venue
- Solar RRL
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-20
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 2367-198X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3165619670
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metal–Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/solr.202100198
- The paper
- Nguyen, H. L. (2021). Metal–Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Solar RRL. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202100198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.