Cited by 1,439Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceCovalent Organic Framework Applications

Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks

Wilmer, Christopher E., Leaf, Michael, Lee, Chang Yeon, Farha, Omar K., Hauser, Brad G., Hupp, Joseph T., Snurr, Randall Q.·2012·Nature Chemistry

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous materials constructed from modular molecular building blocks, typically metal clusters and organic linkers. These can, in principle, be assembled to form an almost unlimited number of MOFs, yet materials reported to date represent only a tiny fraction of the possible combinations. Here, we demonstrate a computational approach to generate all conceivable MOFs from a given chemical library of building blocks (based on the structures of known MOFs) and rapidly screen them to find the best candidates for a specific application. From a library of 102 building blocks we generated 137,953 hypothetical MOFs and for each one calculated the pore-size distribution, surface area and methane-storage capacity. We identified over 300 MOFs with a predicted methane-storage capacity better than that of any known material, and this approach also revealed structure-property relationships. Methyl-functionalized MOFs were frequently top performers, so we selected one such promising MOF and experimentally confirmed its predicted capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchem.1192

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combinatorial enumeration with small changes in linker chemistry and metal SBUs can result in large data sets of 100k or more MOFs, although how well such sets represent the diversity of synthetically accessible materials has been questioned.

    “Combinatorial enumeration with small changes in linker chemistry (e.g., functional groups) and metal SBUs can result in large data sets of 100k or more MOFs (27,28,38,39), although how well such sets represent the diversity of synthetically accessible materials has been questioned (40)”
  • Experimental data sets do not necessarily have the same characteristics as hypothetical sets.

    “It has been observed (40) that experimental data sets [e.g., of MOFs in CoRE-MOF (29)] also do not necessarily have the same characteristics as hypothetical sets [e.g., hMOF (27) or ToBaCCo (28)].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilmer, C. E., Leaf, M., Lee, C. Y., Farha, O. K., Hauser, B. G., Hupp, J. T., & Snurr, R. Q.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Snurr, Randall Q.
Venue
Nature Chemistry
Published
2011-11-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
83-89
ISSN
  • 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-4349
OpenAlex
W2100716186
Cited by
1,439
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 44
FWCI
41.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Northwestern University
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency
  • International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Covalent Organic Framework Applications
Keywords
metal-organic frameworks, computational screening, methane storage, pore size distribution, surface area, structure-property relationships, porous media, combinatorial materials design
MeSH terms
Metals, Models, Chemical, Organic Chemicals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review