Cited by 37Software Engineering ResearchAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques

A recommendation system for repairing violations detected by static architecture conformance checking

Terra, Ricardo, Valente, Marco Tulio, Czarnecki, Krzysztof, Bigonha, Roberto S.·2015·Software: Practice and Experience

Abstract

Summary: This paper describes a recommendation system that provides refactoring guidelines for maintainers when tackling architectural erosion. The paper formalizes 32 refactoring recommendations to repair violations raised by static architecture conformance checking approaches; it describes a tool—called ArchFix—that triggers the proposed recommendations; and it evaluates the application of this tool in two industrial‐strength systems. For the first system—a 21 KLOC open‐source strategic management system—our approach has indicated correct refactoring recommendations for 31 out of 41 violations detected as the result of an architecture conformance process. For the second system—a 728 KLOC customer care system used by a major telecommunication company—our approach has triggered correct recommendations for 624 out of 787 violations, as asserted by the system's architect. Moreover, the architects have scored 82% of these recommendations as having moderate or major complexity. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/spe.2228

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terra, R., Valente, M. T., Czarnecki, K., & Bigonha, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Terra, Ricardo
Venue
Software: Practice and Experience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-25
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
315-342
ISSN
  • 0038-0644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-024X
OpenAlex
W1543881559
Cited by
37
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Software Practice and Experience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Keywords
refactoring recommendation, architectural erosion, software architecture, software maintainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review