A federated learning attack method based on edge collaboration via cloud
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) is widely used in edge‐cloud collaborative training due to its distributed architecture and privacy‐preserving properties without sharing local data. FLTrust, the most state‐of‐the‐art FL defense method, is a federated learning defense system with trust guidance. However, we found that FLTrust is not very robust. Therefore, in the edge collaboration scenario, we mainly study the poisoning attack on the FLTrust defense system. Due to the aggregation rule, FLTrust, with trust guidance, the model updates of participants with a significant deviation from the root gradient direction will be eliminated, which makes the poisoning effect on the global model not obvious. To solve this problem, under the premise of not being deleted by the FLTrust aggregation rules, we construct malicious model updates that deviate from the trust gradient to the greatest extent to achieve model poisoning attacks. First, we utilize the rotation of high‐dimensional vectors around axes to construct malicious vectors with fixed orientations. Second, the malicious vector is constructed by the gradient inversion method to achieve an efficient and fast attack. Finally, a method of optimizing random noise is used to construct a malicious vector with a fixed direction. Experimental results show that our attack method reduces the model accuracy by 20%, severely undermining the usability of the model. Attacks are also successful hundreds of times faster than the FLTrust adaptive attack met…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Generic processing functionalities would aid developers to mix and match when devising edge solutions.
“Similarly, generic processing functionalities would aid developers to mix and match when devising edge solutions [24].”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
A Survey on the Edge Computing for the Internet of Things
Yu, W., Liang, F., He, X., Hatcher, W. G., Lu, C., Lin, J., & Yang, X. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2778504 · Cited by 1,520 · see citing works
Self-citationFLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrapping
Cao, X., Fang, M., Liu, J., & Gong, N. Z. (2021) · Proceedings 2021 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2021.24434 · Cited by 999 · see citing works
Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systems
Tolpegin, V., Truex, S., Gursoy, M. E., & Liu, L. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58951-6_24 · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Using Machine Teaching to Identify Optimal Training-Set Attacks on Machine Learners
Mei, S., & Zhu, X. (2015) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9569 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
PoisonGAN: Generative Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning in Edge Computing Systems
Zhang, J., Chen, B., Cheng, X., Binh, H. T. T., & Yu, S. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3023126 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Qian, B., Su, J., Wen, Z., Jha, D. N., Li, Y., Guan, Y., Puthal, D., James, P., Yang, R., Zomaya, A. Y., et al. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3398020 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, R., & Gill, S. S. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.02.004 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Yang, J., Baker, T., Gill, S. S., Yang, X., Han, W., & Li, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
- University of Sharjah (AE)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- School of Mechanical Manufacturing and Automation Engineer of China Railway Tunnel Bureau Group Co., Ltd Zhengzhou Henan China
- Corresponding author
- Baker, Thar
- Li, Yuanzhang
- Venue
- Software: Practice and Experience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-12-10
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1257-1274
- ISSN
- 0038-0644 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-024X
- OpenAlex
- W4312067640
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Software Practice and Experience (publishedVersion)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1712101)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1936218, 62072037)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
- Keywords
- federated learning, model poisoning, cloud-edge collaboration, gradient inversion, vector rotation, aggregation rules, attack robustness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review