Cited by 929Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDigital Media Forensic Detection

Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systems

Open access
Tolpegin, Vale, Truex, Stacey, Gursoy, Mehmet Emre, Liu, Ling·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-58951-6_24

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolpegin, V., Truex, S., Gursoy, M. E., & Liu, L.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Truex, Stacey
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
480-501
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3087391814
Cited by
927
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 124 · 2025: 219 · 2024: 243 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 6
FWCI
32.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1564097)
  • Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (1564097)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
data poisoning, federated learning, targeted attacks, malicious participants, mislabeled data, model updating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review