The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system
Open accessAbstract
A tuned mass damper (TMD) is a device consisting of small damped spring–mass system attached to a vibrating main system in order to attenuate any undesirable vibrations. In this paper, optimum parameters of TMD system attached to a viscously damped single degree-of-freedom main system are derived for various combinations of excitation and response parameters. The excitation applied to the main system consists of external force and base acceleration modelled as Gaussian white-noise random process. Using numerical searching technique, the optimum damping and tuning frequency ratio of the TMD are obtained for minimization of various mean square responses such as relative displacement, velocity of main mass and force transmitted to the support. The optimum parameters of the TMD system and the corresponding response quantities are obtained for different damping ratios of the main system and the mass ratios of the TMD system. Explicit formulae for damper damping, tuning frequency and the corresponding minimized response are then derived using curve-fitting technique that can be conveniently used for applications in dynamical systems. The error in these expressions is found to be negligible and hence these expressions are convenient for use in damped single degree-of-freedom main system. The optimum damping ratio of the TMD is not much influenced by the damping of the main system. However, the optimum tuning frequency of TMD is significantly affected by the damping of main system. Lastly, a comparison of the optimum damping and tuning frequency of the TMD under filtered white-noise and white-noise excitation is also made. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
OPTIMUM MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR BASE-EXCITED DAMPED MAIN SYSTEM
BAKRE, S. V., & JANGID, R. S. (2004) · International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · doi:10.1142/s0219455404001367 · Cited by 84
Self-citation
Cited by
Marian, L., & Giaralis, A. (2014) · Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007 · Cited by 828
Using multiple tuned mass dampers to control offshore wind turbine vibrations under multiple hazards
Zuo, H., Bi, K., & Hao, H. (2017) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.006 · Cited by 284
Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search
Bekdaş, G., & Nigdeli, S. M. (2011) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.024 · Cited by 259
Wang, J., Wierschem, N. E., Wang, B., & Spencer, B. F. (2020) · The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings · doi:10.1002/tal.1692 · Cited by 62
Closed-form formulas for the optimal pole-based design of tuned mass dampers
Bisegna, P., & Caruso, G. (2012) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.005 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakre, S. V., & Jangid, R. S.
- Venue
- Structural Control and Health Monitoring
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 448-470
- ISSN
- 1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2263
- OpenAlex
- W2053920997
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.