The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OPTIMUM MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR BASE-EXCITED DAMPED MAIN SYSTEM
Abstract
The optimum parameters of multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) for suppressing the dynamic response of a base-excited damped main system are investigated by a numerical searching technique. The criterion selected for the optimality is the minimization of the steady state displacement of the main system under harmonic base acceleration. The parameters of the MTMD that are optimized include: the damping ratio, the tuning frequency ratio and the frequency bandwidth. The optimum parameters of the MTMD system and corresponding displacement are obtained for different damping ratios of the main system and different mass ratios of the MTMD system. The explicit formulas for the optimum parameters of the MTMD (i.e. damping ratio, bandwidth and tuning frequency) are then derived using a curve-fitting scheme that can readily be used in engineering applications. The error in the proposed explicit expressions is investigated and found to be negligible. The effectiveness of the optimally designed MTMD system is also compared with that of the optimum single tuned mass damper. It is observed that the optimally designed MTMD system is more effective for vibration control than the single tuned mass damper. Further, the damping in the main system significantly influences the optimum parameters and the effectiveness of the MTMD system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results show that the optimized MTMDs is better performance than single TMDs.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“The authors have concluded that the optimum damping ratio of the TMD is not much influenced by the damping of the main system but the optimum tuning frequency of TMD is significantly affected by the damping of the main system.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Bakre and Jangid [29]
In the citing paper
“It has been observed that MTMD can be more effective than a single TMD with equal mass and damping ratio and the optimum parameters of the MTMD system are obtained for different mass ratio and number of dampers.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Bakre and Jangid [29]
In the citing paper
“The authors have concluded that the optimum damping ratio of the TMD is not much influenced by the damping of the main system but the optimum tuning frequency of TMD is significantly affected by the damping of the main system.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Bakre and Jangid [29]
Citations
Cites
Bishop, R. E. D. (1957) · Nature · doi:10.1038/179504a0 · Cited by 1,640
Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters
Warburton, G. B. (1982) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290100304 · Cited by 1,059
Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems
Warburton, G. B., & Ayorinde, E. O. (1980) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290080302 · Cited by 376
A Note on the Damped Vibration Absorber
Brock, J. E. (1946) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.4009588 · Cited by 356
Yamaguchi, H., & Harnpornchai, N. (1993) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290220105 · Cited by 341
Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas
Abé, M., & Fujino, Y. (1994) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290230802 · Cited by 329
Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies
Xu, K., & Igusa, T. (1992) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290211203 · Cited by 326
Tsai, H., & Lin, G. (1993) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290221104 · Cited by 279
Design formulas for tuned mass dampers based on a perturbation technique
Fujino, Y., & Abé, M. (1993) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290221002 · Cited by 276
Li, C. (2000) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9 · Cited by 207
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Brock J. E., J. Appl. Mech. ASME, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers
Elias, S., & Matsagar, V. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.015 · Cited by 556
Vibration suppression of structures using tuned mass damper technology: A state-of-the-art review
Yang, F., Sedaghati, R., & Esmailzadeh, E. (2021) · Journal of Vibration and Control · doi:10.1177/1077546320984305 · Cited by 329
Using multiple tuned mass dampers to control offshore wind turbine vibrations under multiple hazards
Zuo, H., Bi, K., & Hao, H. (2017) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.006 · Cited by 292
Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers
Leung, A. Y. T., & Zhang, H. (2008) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017 · Cited by 261
Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system
Bakre, S. V., & Jangid, R. S. (2006) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.166 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BAKRE, S. V., & JANGID, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
- Venue
- International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 04
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 527-542
- ISSN
- 0219-4554 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6764
- OpenAlex
- W2138976160
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
- Keywords
- multiple tuned mass dampers, vibration control, optimal damper parameters, damping ratio, bandwidth, mass ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
