CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic Performance and AnalysisStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A leverage-type stiffness controllable mass damper for vibration mitigation of structures: A Leverage-Type SCMD for Vibration Mitigation of Structures

Chu, Shih-Yu, Yeh, Shih-Wei, Lu, Lyan-Ywan, Peng, Chih-Hua·2017·Structural Control and Health Monitoring
DOI 10.1002/stc.1896
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are well recognized as an effective technology for mitigating structural vibration caused by wind loads. Therefore, some researchers have advocated applying TMDs for the vibration mitigation of structures subjected to earthquakes. Nevertheless, the seismic performance of a conventional TMD may not be as effective as expected because the frequency content and magnitude of an earthquake usually fluctuate and are far more complex than wind loads. To resolve this problem, the leverage-type stiffness controllable mass damper (LSCMD), a semi-active mass damper, is proposed in this paper. The LSCMD has a lever arm with a movable pivot, allowing it to control the damper stiffness and restoring force in real time by adjusting the pivot position. To evaluate the control effectiveness of the LSCMD, the seismic responses of a structural system equipped with the LSCMD were simulated and compared with those of the same structure controlled by two optimally designed passive TMDs and a hybrid mass damper (HMD) with the same control law as that of the LSCMD. The results of the simulation demonstrate that the control performance of the LSCMD system can be enhanced by varying the LSCMD stiffness. Although the LSCMD and HMD are equally effective in suppressing the maximum responses of the structure, the former requires less control energy. This indicates that the proposed LSCMD is more desirable when the damper installation space and energy consumption are major concerns. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/stc.1896

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Chung, 2013, Optimal design formulas for viscous tuned mass dampers in wind-excited structures, Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 20, 320, 10.1002/stc.496 · DOI
  2. Lu, 2011, Mitigation of wind-induced response of Shanghai Center Tower by tuned mass damper, Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20, 435, 10.1002/tal.659 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Warburton, 1982, Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10, 381, 10.1002/eqe.4290100304 · DOI
  4. Ikago, 2012, Seismic control of single-degree-of-freedom structure using tuned viscous mass damper, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41, 453, 10.1002/eqe.1138 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rakicevic, 2012, Effectiveness of tune mass damper in the reduction of the seismic response of the structure, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 1049, 10.1007/s10518-012-9341-3 · DOI
  6. Bekdas, 2013, Mass ratio factor for optimum tuned mass damper strategies, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 71, 68, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.03.014 · DOI
  7. Marano, 2011, Optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers for structural vibration control under stochastic excitation, Journal of Vibration and Control, 17, 679, 10.1177/1077546310365988 · DOI
  8. Abdulsalam, 2009, Optimum design of tuned mass damper systems for seismic structures, 7th International Conference on Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures, 104, 175, 10.2495/ERES090161 · DOI
  9. Soleymani, 2014, Adaptive fuzzy controller for active tuned mass damper of a benchmark tall building subjected to seismic and wind loads, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23, 781, 10.1002/tal.1091 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Noormohammadi, 2013, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, 8688
  11. Guclu, 2008, Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 318, 36, 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.058 · DOI
  12. Chu, 2005, Active, hybrid, and semi-active structural control: a design and implementation handbook
  13. Samali, 2003, Performance of a five-storey benchmark model using an active tuned mass damper and a fuzzy controller, Engineering Structures, 25, 1597, 10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00132-9 · DOI
  14. Chu, 2002, Time-delay effect and compensation on direct output feedback controlled mass damper systems, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31, 121, 10.1002/eqe.101 · DOI
  15. Lin, 2012, Experimental verification of seismic vibration control using a semi-active friction tuned mass damper, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41, 813, 10.1002/eqe.1162 · DOI
  16. Lin, 2010, Vibration control of seismic structures using semi-active friction multiple tuned mass dampers, Engineering Structures, 32, 3404, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.014 · DOI
  17. Lin, 2013, A semi-active mass damping system for low- and mid-rise buildings, Earthquakes and Structures, 4, 63, 10.12989/eas.2013.4.1.063 · DOI
  18. Lin, 2005, Semiactive control of building structures with semiactive tuned mass damper, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20, 35, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00375.x · DOI
  19. Kang, 2011, Mitigation of wind response of a tall building using semi-active tuned mass dampers, Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20, 552, 10.1002/tal.609 · DOI
  20. Yang, 2010, Optimal vibration suppression of structures under random base excitation using semi-active mass damper, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics-Transactions of the Asme, 132, 10.1115/1.4000969 · DOI
  21. Setareh, 2007, Semiactive tuned mass damper for floor vibration control, Journal of Structural Engineering-Asce, 133, 242, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:2(242) · DOI
  22. Deshmukh, 2014, LQR control of wind excited benchmark building using variable stiffness tuned mass damper, Shock and Vibration, 2014, 10.1155/2014/156523 · DOI
  23. Nagarajaiah, 2007, Structures with semiactive variable stiffness single/multiple tuned mass dampers, Journal of Structural Engineering-Asce, 133, 67, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(67) · DOI
  24. Yan AZ Teng J Lu ZX Analysis for seismic response of Wutong TV-Tower with variable stiffness tuned mass 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2006
  25. Nagarajaiah, 2005, Short time Fourier transform algorithm for wind response control of buildings with variable stiffness TMD, Engineering Structures, 27, 431, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.015 · DOI
  26. Nagarajaiah, 2009, Adaptive passive, semiactive, smart tuned mass dampers: identification and control using empirical mode decomposition, hilbert transform, and short-term Fourier transform, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 16, 800, 10.1002/stc.349 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Chey, 2010, Semi-active tuned mass damper building systems: application, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39, 69, 10.1002/eqe.933 · DOI
  28. Chey, 2010, Semi-active tuned mass damper building systems: design, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39, 119, 10.1002/eqe.934 · DOI
  29. Bonello, 2005, Vibration control using an adaptive tuned vibration absorber with a variable curvature stiffness element, Smart Materials & Structures, 14, 1055, 10.1088/0964-1726/14/5/044 · DOI
  30. Nagarajaiah S. Adaptive stiffness systems: recent developments in structural control using semiactive/smart variable stiffness and adaptive passive stiffness 5th World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring 2010
  31. Sun, 2014, Study on semi-active tuned mass damper with variable damping and stiffness under seismic excitations, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 21, 890, 10.1002/stc.1620 · DOI
  32. Lu, 2012, Seismic test of least-input-energy control with ground velocity feedback for variable-stiffness isolation systems, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331, 767, 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.10.012 · DOI
  33. Chu, 2008, Optimal performance of discrete-time direct output-feedback structural control with delayed control forces, Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 15, 20, 10.1002/stc.193 · DOI
  34. Chung, 1993, Optimal direct output feedback of structural control, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), 119, 2157, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:11(2157) · DOI
  35. Lewis, 1992, Applied Optimal Control and Estimation
  36. Sadek, 1997, A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 26, 617, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chu, S.-Y., Yeh, S.-W., Lu, L.-Y., & Peng, C.-H.
Affiliations
National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chu, Shih-Yu
ORCID
Venue
Structural Control and Health Monitoring
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-10
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
e1896
ISSN
1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1002/stc.1896
OpenAlex
W2519436522
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Structural Control and Health Monitoring (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (Taiwan) (MOST-102-2625-M-006-003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
tuned mass damper, stiffness control, lever mechanism, hybrid mass damper, control energy consumption, structural vibration control, earthquake response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review