Cited by 19Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesBladed Disk Vibration DynamicsControl Systems and Identification

Spectral characteristics of asynchronous data in operational modal analysis

Zhu, Yi-Chen, Au, Siu-Kui·2017·Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Abstract

Operational modal analysis (OMA) has gained popularity for identifying the modal properties of a structure for its high economy and feasibility. Conventionally, time synchronisation among data channels is required to determine mode shape. OMA can be conducted more flexibly if synchronisation is not required. The power spectral density (PSD) matrix of data and its spectral properties are often used for analysing potential modes. Conventionally known properties assume synchronous data and do not carry over to asynchronous data. This paper investigates the spectral properties of asynchronous OMA data. A stationary process with imperfect coherence is proposed that is conducive to OMA while capturing the key asynchronous characteristics. The theoretical properties of PSD matrix are derived and validated using synthetic and experimental data. Although conventional methods do not allow mode shape to be determined from asynchronous data, the present work reveals the possibility by noting that the data are measured under the same excitation and hence share a common PSD in the modal force. On this basis, a simple method is proposed for determining the mode shape. For perfectly incoherent data channels, it is not possible to determine the relative sense of their mode shape values, which is a fundamental limitation of such data. In implementation, the sense can be determined from intuition or estimated from the residual coherence between channels. Experimental application reveals practical issues in OMA with asynchronous data. This work aspires to provide the pathway for more flexible implementation of OMA, for example, using asynchronous data from multiple smart phones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/stc.1981

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Y.-C., & Au, S.-K.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Risk and Uncertainty and Centre for Engineering Dynamics; University of Liverpool; Liverpool UK
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
Structural Control and Health Monitoring
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-06
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
e1981
ISSN
1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587745781
Cited by
18
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Structural Control and Health Monitoring (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M507301/1, EP/N017897/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Bladed Disk Vibration Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
operational modal analysis, asynchronous data, mode shape identification, coherence, stationary processes, modal force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review