The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed and lethal cancers worldwide. It is a multistep process that requires the accumulation of genetic/epigenetic aberrations. There are several issues concerning colorectal carcinogenesis that remain unanswered, such as the cell of origin and the type of cells that propagate the tumor after its initiation. There are two models of carcinogenesis: the stochastic and the cancer stem cell (CSC) model. According to the stochastic model, any kind of cell is capable of initiating and promoting cancer development, whereas the CSC model suggests that tumors are hierarchically organized and only CSCs possess cancer-promoting potential. Moreover, various molecular pathways, such as Wingless/Int (Wnt) and Notch, as well as the complex crosstalk network between microenvironment and CSCs, are involved in CRC. Identification of CSCs remains controversial due to the lack of widely accepted specific molecular markers. CSCs are responsible for tumor relapse, because conventional drugs fail to eliminate the CSC reservoir. Therefore, the design of CSC-targeted interventions is a rational target, which will enhance responsiveness to traditional therapeutic strategies and reduce local recurrence and metastasis. This review discusses the implications of the newly introduced CSC model in CRC, the markers used up to now for CSC identification, and its potential implications in the design of novel therapeutic approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche
Sato, T., Vries, R. G., Snippert, H. J., van de Wetering, M., Barker, N., Stange, D. E., van Es, J. H., Abo, A., Kujala, P., Peters, P. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07935 · Cited by 7,204
Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5
Barker, N., van Es, J. H., Kuipers, J., Kujala, P., van den Born, M., Cozijnsen, M., Haegebarth, A., Korving, J., Begthel, H., Peters, P. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06196 · Cited by 5,687
Cited by
Chen, W.-J., Ho, C.-C., Chang, Y.-L., Chen, H.-Y., Lin, C.-A., Ling, T.-Y., Yu, S.-L., Yuan, S.-S., Louisa Chen, Y.-J., Lin, C.-Y., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4472 · Cited by 422
Antimicrobial peptides and gut microbiota in homeostasis and pathology
Ostaff, M. J., Stange, E. F., & Wehkamp, J. (2013) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.201201773 · Cited by 329
YTHDF1 Regulates Tumorigenicity and Cancer Stem Cell-Like Activity in Human Colorectal Carcinoma
Bai, Y., Yang, C., Wu, R., Huang, L., Song, S., Li, W., Yan, P., Lin, C., Li, D., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00332 · Cited by 267
Therapies targeting cancer stem cells: Current trends and future challenges
Dragu, D. L. (2015) · World Journal of Stem Cells · doi:10.4252/wjsc.v7.i9.1185 · Cited by 257
Role of epigenetics in transformation of inflammation into colorectal cancer
Yang, Z.-H., Dang, Y.-Q., & Ji, G. (2019) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v25.i23.2863 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaiopoulos, A. G., Kostakis, I. D., Koutsilieris, M., & Papavassiliou, A. G.
- Venue
- STEM CELLS
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-02-14
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-371
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2028663226
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.