The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lumbar Intraspinal Injection of Neural Stem Cells in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Results of a Phase I Trial in 12 Patients
Open accessAbstract
Advances in stem cell biology have generated intense interest in the prospect of transplanting stem cells into the nervous system for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we report the results of an ongoing phase I trial of intraspinal injections of fetal-derived neural stems cells in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This is a first-in-human clinical trial with the goal of assessing the safety and tolerability of the surgical procedure, the introduction of stem cells into the spinal cord, and the use of immunosuppressant drugs in this patient population. Twelve patients received either five unilateral or five bilateral (10 total) injections into the lumbar spinal cord at a dose of 100,000 cells per injection. All patients tolerated the treatment without any long-term complications related to either the surgical procedure or the implantation of stem cells. Clinical assessments ranging from 6 to 18 months after transplantation demonstrated no evidence of acceleration of disease progression due to the intervention. One patient has shown improvement in his clinical status, although these data must be interpreted with caution since this trial was neither designed nor powered to measure treatment efficacy. These results allow us to report success in achieving the phase I goal of demonstrating safety of this therapeutic approach. Based on these positive results, we can now advance this trial by testing intraspinal injections into the cervical spinal cord, with the goal of protecting motor neuron pools affecting respiratory function, which may prolong life for patients with ALS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ALSFRS-R score and its ratio: A useful predictor for ALS-progression
Kollewe, K., Mauss, U., Krampfl, K., Petri, S., Dengler, R., & Mohammadi, B. (2008) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2008.07.016 · Cited by 253
Cited by
The changing scene of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Robberecht, W., & Philips, T. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3430 · Cited by 957
Prevalence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis — United States, 2014
Mehta, P., Kaye, W., Raymond, J., Wu, R., Larson, T., Punjani, R., Heller, D., Cohen, J., Peters, T., Muravov, O., et al. (2018) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6707a3 · Cited by 458
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Focus on Disease Progression
Calvo, A. C., Manzano, R., Mendonça, D. M. F., Muñoz, M. J., Zaragoza, P., & Osta, R. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/925101 · Cited by 403
Liu, J., & Wang, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01005 · Cited by 376
Mazzini, L., Gelati, M., Profico, D. C., Sorarù, G., Ferrari, D., Copetti, M., Muzi, G., Ricciolini, C., Carletti, S., Giorgi, C., et al. (2019) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/sctm.18-0154 · Cited by 128
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Glass, J. D., Boulis, N. M., Johe, K., Rutkove, S. B., Federici, T., Polak, M., Kelly, C., & Feldman, E. L.
- Venue
- STEM CELLS
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-05-15
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1144-1151
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2080474239
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.