Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Abstract
Stem cell-based therapies for neurodegenerative diseases aim at halting clinical deterioration by regeneration and by providing local support for damaged tissue. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold great potential for cell therapy as they can be efficiently derived from adult tissue, ex vivo expanded in culture and safely transplanted autologously. MSCs were also shown to be able to differentiate toward neural fates and to secrete a broad range of factors able to promote nervous tissue maintenance and repair. Moreover, upon transplantation, MSCs were shown capable of homing toward lesioned areas, implying their potential use as vehicles for therapeutic agents administration. Indeed, various advantageous effects were reported following human MSCs transplantation into rodent models of neurodegenerative diseases, such as neurotrophic factor-mediated protection, enhanced neurogenesis, modulation of inflammation, and abnormal protein aggregate clearance. Recent studies have also used ex vivo manipulation for enhanced expression of potentially favorable factors, by so exploiting the homing capacity of MSCs for effective expression at the lesion site. Here, we will summarize current advancements in MSCs-based therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. We will examine the roles of central mechanisms suggested to mediate the beneficial effects of MSCs-based therapy and consider the augmentation of these mechanisms for superior clinical outcomes in rodent models of neurodegeneration as well as in clinical trials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cells need a far higher dose of therapeutic medications than any other kind, so they might be swiftly trapped in lung capillaries and removed.
“Cells need a far higher dose of therapeutic medications than any other kind, so they might be swiftly trapped in lung capillaries and removed.328”
From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [328]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 130 · Cited by 222
- Authors
- Volkman, R., & Offen, D.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Offen, Daniel
- Venue
- Stem Cells
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-06-30
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1867-1880
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2623996578
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 130
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-09-12)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Stem Cells (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- mesenchymal stem cells, neurodegenerative diseases, stem cell therapy, neuronal differentiation, paracrine factors, neurogenesis, neuroinflammation, protein aggregate clearance, cell homing, neurotrophic factors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Nerve Growth Factors, Nerve Regeneration, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation, Immunomodulation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review