The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulating metal–organic frameworks for catalyzing acidic oxygen evolution for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis
Open accessAbstract
Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis represents one of the most promising technologies to achieve green hydrogen production, but currently its practical viability is largely affected by the slow reaction kinetics of the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in an acidic environment. While noble metal‐based catalysts containing iridium or ruthenium are excellent catalysts for the acidic OER, their practical use in PEM electrolyzers is hindered due to their low abundance and high cost. Most recently, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been demonstrated as a perfect platform to facilitate the design of acidic OER catalysts with both high efficiency and cost‐effectiveness. Here, we provide a timely and comprehensive overview of the recent progress on MOF‐based acidic OER catalysts. The fundamental mechanisms of the acidic OER are first introduced, followed by a summary of the development of pristine MOFs and MOF derivatives as acidic OER catalysts. Importantly, a number of catalyst design strategies are discussed aiming at improving the acidic OER catalytic performance of MOF‐based candidates. The integration of MOF‐based catalysts into real PEM water electrolyzers is also included. Finally, future research directions are provided to achieve better MOF‐based catalysts operational in acidic environments and PEM devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Peters, J. C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja407115p · Cited by 7,026
Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces
Man, I. C., Su, H., Calle‐Vallejo, F., Hansen, H. A., Martínez, J. I., Inoglu, N. G., Kitchin, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Nørskov, J. K., & Rossmeisl, J. (2011) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201000397 · Cited by 4,769
A review on fundamentals for designing oxygen evolution electrocatalysts
Song, J., Wei, C., Huang, Z.-F., Liu, C., Zeng, L., Wang, X., & Xu, Z. J. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00607a · Cited by 2,936
Kim, J., Shih, P.-C., Tsao, K.-C., Pan, Y.-T., Yin, X., Sun, C.-J., & Yang, H. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b06808 · Cited by 501
Tian, Y., Wang, S., Velasco, E., Yang, Y., Cao, L., Zhang, L., Li, X., Lin, Y., Zhang, Q., & Chen, L. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2019.100756 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Meng, N., Ma, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Yang, R., Shao, J., Huang, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, B., & Yu, Y. (2022) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c01177 · Cited by 322
Tailoring a local acid-like microenvironment for efficient neutral hydrogen evolution
Zheng, X., Shi, X., Ning, H., Yang, R., Lu, B., Luo, Q., Mao, S., Xi, L., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39963-8 · Cited by 247
Fei, L., Sun, H., Xu, X., Li, Y., Ran, R., Zhou, W., & Shao, Z. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.144660 · Cited by 134
Self-citationYu, J., Li, Z., Liu, T., Zhao, S., Guan, D., Chen, D., Shao, Z., & Ni, M. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.141674 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, X., Sun, H., Jiang, S. P., & Shao, Z.
- Venue
- SusMat
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 460-481
- ISSN
- 2692-4552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200186274
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.