Cited by 57Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Dose–response analysis of locomotor activity and stereotypy in dopamine D3 receptor mutant mice following acute amphetamine

Open access
McNamara, Robert K., Logue, Aaron, Stanford, Kevin, Xu, Ming, Zhang, Jianhua, Richtand, Neil M.·2006·Synapse

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) stimulation is inhibitory to spontaneous and psychostimulant-induced locomotion through opposition of concurrent D1R and D2R-mediated signaling. To evaluate this model, we used homozygous D3R mutant mice and wild-type controls to investigate the role of the D3R in locomotor activity and stereotypy stimulated by acute amphetamine (AMPH) (0.2, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 mg/kg). At the lowest dose tested (0.2 mg/kg), neither D3R mutant mice nor wild-type mice exhibited measurable change in locomotor activity or stereotypy relative to their respective saline-treated controls. D3R mutant mice exhibited a significantly greater increase in locomotor activity, but not stereotypy, relative to wild-type mice in response to treatment with AMPH 2.5 mg/kg. AMPH-induced locomotor activity and stereotypy were similar in both wild-type and D3R mutant mice at both the 5.0 and 10 mg/kg AMPH doses. These findings provide further support for an inhibitory role for the D3R in AMPH-induced locomotor activity, and demonstrate a more limited role for the D3R in modulating AMPH-induced stereotypy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syn.20315

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNamara, R. K., Logue, A., Stanford, K., Xu, M., Zhang, J., & Richtand, N. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
McNamara, Robert K.
Venue
Synapse
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
399-405
ISSN
  • 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2396
OpenAlex
W1969579537
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Synapse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29da011284-02)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 016778-01, DA-14644, DA11284, R01DA014644, R01DA017323, DA17323, R01DA016778)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
dopamine D3 receptor, amphetamine, locomotor activity, stereotypy, dose-response relationship, receptor antagonism
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Animals, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Disease Models, Animal, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Neural Inhibition, Synaptic Transmission, Dopamine Agents, Mice, Knockout, Stereotypic Movement Disorder, Receptors, Dopamine D3, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review