The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for release of copper in the brain: Depolarization‐induced release of newly taken‐up 67copper
Abstract
The potential importance of copper (Cu) in neurosecretion can be inferred from the demonstration that extracellular Cu modulates the secretory function of peptidergic neurons (in vitro studies) and from the presence of high Cu concentrations in nerve terminals and secretory vesicles, primarily within the soluble matrix of the latter. We have previously hypothesized that vesicular Cu is released from neurons undergoing exocytosis and that such extracellular Cu plays an important modulatory role in the central nervous system. To test this Cu release hypothesis, rat hypothalami were incubated under in vitro conditions for 1 or 2 hr with 20 nM radiolabeled Cu (67 Cu), and then 67 Cu release was stimulated by a depolarizing concentration (60 mM) of K+. K+ markedly (P < 0.001) stimulated 67 Cu release in a Ca 2+‐dependent manner (stimulated release was 95 fmol/10 min/mg protein after 1 hr 67 Cu loading and 160 after 2 hr). These amounts of released 67 Cu account for about 10% of the total 67 Cu taken up by the tissue. These results indicate that part of the 67 Cu taken up by hypothalamic explants is directed into an intracellular compartment from where it can be released by a Ca 2+‐dependent mechanism, thus providing strong support to our hypothesis that release of copper is operative in situ in the brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metals in Neurobiology: Probing Their Chemistry and Biology with Molecular Imaging
Que, E. L., Domaille, D. W., & Chang, C. J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr078203u · Cited by 2,061
The metallobiology of Alzheimer's disease
Bush, A. I. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(03)00067-5 · Cited by 1,315
Atwood, C. S., Scarpa, R. C., Huang, X., Moir, R. D., Jones, W. D., Fairlie, D. P., Tanzi, R. E., & Bush, A. I. (2000) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0751219.x · Cited by 641
Synthetic fluorescent probes for studying copper in biological systems
Cotruvo, Jr., Aron, A. T., Ramos-Torres, K. M., & Chang, C. J. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00346b · Cited by 558
Copper and iron disorders of the brain
Madsen, E., & Gitlin, J. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094232 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartter, D. E., & Barnea, A.
- Venue
- Synapse
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 412-415
- ISSN
- 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2396
- OpenAlex
- W2054978422
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for release of copper in the brain: Depolarization‐induced release of newly taken‐up 67copper. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/syn.890020408
- The paper
- Hartter, D. E., & Barnea, A. (1988). Evidence for release of copper in the brain: Depolarization‐induced release of newly taken‐up 67copper. Synapse. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.890020408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.