The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On Being Green: Can Flow Chemistry Help?
Abstract
The principles of Green Chemistry are important but challenging drivers for most modern synthesis programs. To meet these challenges new flow chemistry tools are proving to be very effective by providing improved heat/mass transfer opportunities, lower solvent usage, less waste generation, hazardous compound containment, and the possibility of a 24/7 working regime. This machine‐assisted approach can be used to effect repetitive or routine scale‐up steps or when combined with reagent and scavenger cartridges, to achieve multi‐step synthesis of complex natural products and pharmaceutical agents. DOI 10.1002/tcr.201100041
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry
Plutschack, M. B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K., & Seeberger, P. H. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183 · Cited by 1,995
Flow Bioreactors as Complementary Tools for Biocatalytic Process Intensification
Tamborini, L., Fernandes, P., Paradisi, F., & Molinari, F. (2018) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.09.005 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Ley, S. V.
- Venue
- The Chemical Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 378-390
- ISSN
- 1527-8999 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0691
- OpenAlex
- W2026391967
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Being Green: Can Flow Chemistry Help? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tcr.201100041
- The paper
- Ley, S. V. (2012). On Being Green: Can Flow Chemistry Help? The Chemical Record. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201100041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
