The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools*
Abstract
There are numerous empirical reports in the science education literature documenting the difficulty students have in understanding evolution, in particular natural selection. Unfortunately, because of the nature of empirical reports, much detail about the instruction that students in these studies received is seldom provided. In this article we describe the commitments and research that went into the design of a 9‐week high school course in evolutionary biology. This course was designed to bring students to an understanding of the practice of evolutionary biology by engaging them in developing, elaborating, and using one of the discipline's most important explanatory models—Darwin's model of natural selection. This article is not an empirical report on student understanding but is instead a description of our view of what constitutes understanding in evolution and of a curriculum designed from this perspective. Examples of student work are used to add richness to the description of the course as well as to illustrate the potential for sophisticated reasoning that exists when students are given the opportunity and conceptual tools to engage in realistic inquiry. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 185–204, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution
Dobzhansky, T. (1973) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.2307/4444260 · Cited by 3,219
Cited by
Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work
Reiser, B. J. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2 · Cited by 1,054
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1 · Cited by 798
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20421 · Cited by 416
Biology Majors' Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection
Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b570311 · Cited by 406
Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice
Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21037 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Passmore, C., & Stewart, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-204
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W1964774349
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.10020
- The paper
- Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools*. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.