The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biology Majors' Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection
Abstract
This article reports on a study that assessed knowledge of and misconceptions about natural selection in second-semester biology majors in two classes characterized by different instructional strategies. The active-learning class achieved significant postcourse gains in the number and diversity of key concepts of natural selection employed in evolutionary explanations and exhibited significant decreases in misconception use. Compared with the traditionally taught class, the active-learning class was characterized by fewer misconceptions and greater mean key-concept diversity scores. Nevertheless, both classes demonstrated inadequate postcourse levels of evolutionary understanding: After a year of college biology, 70 percent of students in the active-learning group and 86 percent in the traditionally taught group employed one or more misconceptions in their evolutionary explanations. Faculty in upper-division courses must be prepared to address students' misconceptions and provide additional opportunities for improving student understanding of natural selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Cited by 12,812
Introduction to research in education
Ary, D. (1972) · Cited by 7,699
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
Bloom, B., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1966) · Cited by 4,616
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
(2010) · Encyclopedia of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.4135/9781412958806.n446 · Cited by 2,317
Maienschein, J. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/369716c0 · Cited by 2,247
BIO2010 : Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists
Earth, D. O. (2003) · Cited by 855
Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660270503 · Cited by 799
Rocks of ages: science and religion in the fullness of life
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3850 · Cited by 576
Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10053 · Cited by 572
Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students
Brumby, M. N. (1984) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730680412 · Cited by 328
Cited by
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · Cited by 9,787
Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology
Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024 · Cited by 629
Promoting Student Metacognition
Tanner, K. D. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033 · Cited by 618
Järnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.005 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L.
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-272
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2102497733
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 73.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biology Majors' Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1641/b570311
- The paper
- Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology Majors' Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1641/b570311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.